NIT 1110 Construction & Maintenance Road Under PMGSY-IV PKG No CG07-134 District-Jashpur

T-1 T-2 T-3 T-4 T-5 T-6 T-7 T-8 T-9 Remarks 2 PMC BM GIII GII WMM GSB SG Crust #REF! 7 PMC BM GIII GII WMM GSB SG Crust #REF!

3 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 GIII 3 PMC BM GIII GII WMM GSB SG Crust #REF! 10 PMC BM GIII GII WMM GSB SG Crust #REF!

5 0.100 0.100 0.100 SG 5 PMC BM GIII GII WMM GSB SG Crust #REF!

10 0.075 0.075 0.150 0.150 GII 2 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

10 0.225 WMM 3 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

10 0.100 0.125 0.175 0.150 0.125 0.150 0.125 0.175 0.125 GSB Traffice Category #REF! 5 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

10 SG CBR #REF! 7 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

10 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Namef Road: #REF!

Length: #REF! Length No.

Existing CDs Structures Remarks Proposed CDs Structures Remarks Sr. No CD Type & Details No of CDs Ex CD Deduct 32.4 12 ,,,4015,,,7190,,,,,,m 310,1125,,,4775,6760,,,,,,m ,,,,,,m ,,1675,,,m ,,,,,m

No. CH (m) CD Type & Details No. CH (m) CD Type & Details Ex CD List Deduction 50.6 0 12 1 1.5 3 6 12

1 310 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Damage Condition 1 310 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Replacement 1.5 Pro. CD List 1 1R X 1000mm Dia H.P.C 2 Field crossing 310

2 425 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition 2 1125 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Replacement 1.5 Abs. CD'!A1 1.5 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert 4 Sno. Chainage 1125

3 1125 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Damage Condition 3 1675 6.0 m Span Slab Culvert Replacement 6 C2 n'!S286 3 3.0 m Span Slab Culvert 0 1 1675

4 1675 4.0 m Span Slab Culvert Damage Condition 4 4015 1R X 1000mm Dia H.P.C Proposed 1 F-2B'!Z11 6 6.0 m Span Slab Culvert 1 2 4015

5 1750 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition 5 4775 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Replacement 1.5 12 2 X 6.0 m Span Slab Culvert 0 3 4775

6 1825 3.0 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition 6 6760 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Replacement 1.5 15 FLUSH CAUSEWAY 0 4 6760

7 2875 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition 7 7190 1R X 1000mm Dia H.P.C Replacement 1 20 Long Span Bridge 0 5 7190

8 3200 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition #N/A PROPOSED CD 7 6

9 3260 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition #N/A EXISTING CD 18 7

10 3875 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition #N/A Replacement 6 8

11 4375 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition #N/A Field crossing #REF! 9

12 4775 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Damage Condition #N/A 10

13 5050 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition #N/A 11

14 5250 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition #N/A 12

15 5575 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition #N/A 13

16 5875 1R X 1000mm Dia H.P.C Good Condition #N/A 14

17 6760 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Damage Condition #N/A 15

18 7190 1R X 1000mm Dia H.P.C Damage Condition #N/A 16

#N/A Total RD-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,M

NH-43 To Bejgapara

CURVE DESIGN TABLE

Curve CH. of the Radius of Dev. L Ts H.I.P. V Ls(I) Ls(II) Ls Max 0s C Lc S Ts Es e BC EC Total Length of Curve (M.)

No. start point. Curve Angle (M) (M) (M) Km/ph (M) (M) (M) (Deg) (Deg) (M) (M) (M) (M) IN % (M) (M)

of curve in (Metre) (Deg)

TOTAL LENGTH OF CURVE 0.00

#REF! #REF! #REF!

, % V- R- d- Ts-

S- Lc- Ls- Es- e-

, % V- R- d- Ts-

S- Lc- Ls- Es- e-

, % V- R- d- Ts-

S- Lc- Ls- Es- e-

, % V- R- d- Ts-

S- Lc- Ls- Es- e-

, % V- R- d- Ts-

S- Lc- Ls- Es- e-

, % V- R- d- Ts-

S- Lc- Ls- Es- e-

, % V- R- d- Ts-

S- Lc- Ls- Es- e-

, % V- R- d- Ts-

S- Lc- Ls- Es- e-

, % V- R- d- Ts-

S- Lc- Ls- Es- e-

, % V- R- d- Ts-

S- Lc- Ls- Es- e-

10 V-,R-,d-,Ts-

, % V- R- d- Ts-

S- Lc- Ls- Es- e-

11 V-,R-,d-,Ts-

A. Chapters Chapters 0 to 0

1 . Introduction

2 . Planning and Basic Design Consideration

Figure-1 Road Map of India and state

Figure-2 District Map

Figure-3 Block Maps showing all existing connectivity like District/block HQ, new townships, National and State highway network, mandis, hospitals, colleges, schools etc.

Figure-4 Strip plan showing land and alignment details

3 . Topographic Survey

4 . Soil and Materials Survey

Figure -5 Quarry Map

5 . Traffic Survey

6 . Hydrological Survey

7 . Geometric Design Standards

8 . Alignment Design

9 . Pavement Design

10 . Design of Cross Drainage

11 . Protective Works & Drainage

12 . Land Acquisition

13 . Utility shifting/relocation

14 . Road Safety and Traffic Management

15 . Specification

16 . Environmental Issues

17 New/Green Technologies

18 Climate Resilient and Carbon Reduction Strategies

19 Analysis of Rates

20 Cost Estimate

21 Construction Program

1 . Proforma B Package Summary #REF! to 241

2 . Proforma C Check List for PIU & STA (Separately Attached) 242 to 245

3 . Format F1 Package-wise Summary Sheet 246 to 246

4 . Format F2A Pavement layer details 247 to 247

5 . Format F2B CD structures details 248 to 248

6 . Format F3A Details of Typical Cross Section of Existing Pavement

7 . Format F3B Details of Typical Proposed Cross section of pavement. 249 to

8 . Format F4 Details of Existing Roads for Upgradation 249 to 249

9 . Format F5 Association of Roads

10 . Format F6 Cost estimate for Road Construction Works – Pavement Works 250 to 281

11 . Format F7 Cost estimate for Cross Drainage Works – Slab Culvert 282 to 293

12 . Format F8 Rate of Materials supplied at site – Rate Analysis

13 . Format F9A Certificate of Ground Verification from Executive Engineer / Head of PIU 294 to 294

14 . Format F9B List of DPRs verified on Ground 295 to 298

15 . 15. Checklist for community consultation on engineering 299 to 302

1.1 Objectives of Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana PMGSY - IV

i. i. Gramin Agricultural Markets (GrAMs)

ii. Higher Secondary Schools

iii. Hospitals PMGSY-III will include such linkages.

PMGSY programme focus on Up-gradation of existing Through Routes and Major Rural Links based on priority giving importance to critical facilities like the rural markets and education & health facilities. This programme provides connectivity, easy access and faster movement from the habitations to Mandis, agricultural Markets, other farmer related enterprises, higher secondary schools, colleges, hospitals etc in order to improve the quality life of rural populous. This is a 5 years programme from 2019-20.

1.2 All Weather Road

An all-weather road is one which is negotiable during all weathers, with some permitted interruptions. Essentially this means that at cross-drainage structures, the duration of overflow or interruption at one stretch shall not exceed 12 hours for ODRs and 24 hours for VRs in hilly terrain, and 3 days in the case of roads in plain terrain. The total period of interruption during the year should not exceed 10 days for ODRs and 15 days for VRs.

1.3 Core Network & District Rural Road Plan

PMGSY-I programme is based on the Core Network. The Core Network is the network of all the Rural Roads that are necessary to provide basic access to all the Habitations. A Core Network is extracted out of the total Network mentioned in the DRRP and consists of existing roads as well as the roads required to be constructed to the unconnected Habitations. The DRRP is a road network in a district, showing the entire existing road network with updated surface conditions, the habitations of various population size and roads proposed for connecting the habitations from another connected habitations/ all-weather roads in an economic and efficient way in terms of cost and utility. It is also known as the Master Plan for Rural Roads for the district. The Census data of 2011 is being used for PMGSY-II and PMGSY-III. Under PMGSY II and PMGSY-III, District Rural Road Plan is the basis for selection of roads. The DRRP comprises of Through routes and Link routes. Under PMGSY-II and PMGSY-III, the DRRP includes identification of candidate roads among the existing Through routes (TRs) and Link Routes (LRs) based on utility value per unit road length of candidate road. The candidate roads are to be selected based on the ranking generated by the Trace Maps using Q-GIS software.

1.3 Core Network The Sub-project road , is a link road with Code in block of District. This road directly connects the habitations of with populations of respectively. Thus this link road serves the total population of . - is panchayat H.Q. As per guidelines of PMGSY habitation which are grampanchayat . Even if the population is Above 500 will qualify uner PMGSY norms. So, this proposal is proposed for sanction. .

The Sub-project road NH-43 To Bejgapara , is a link road with Code in Pathalgaon block of Jashpur District. This road directly connects the habitations of with populations of respectively. Thus this link road serves the total population of . - is panchayat H.Q. As per guidelines of PMGSY habitation which are grampanchayat . Even if the population is Above 500 will qualify uner PMGSY norms. So, this proposal is proposed for sanction..

The north-south length of this district is about 150 km, and its east-west breadth is about 85 km. Its total area is 6,205 km². It is between 22° 17′ and 23° 15′ North latitude and 83° 30′ and 84° 24′ East longitude. Geographical area was 6701 km². It is bordered by Balrampur district to the north, Gumla district of Jharkhand to the east, Simdega district of Jharkhand and Sundergarh district of Odisha to the southeast, Raigarh district to the southwest and Surguja district to the west. It is divided geographically into two parts. The northern hilly belt is called the Upper Ghat. The remaining, southern part, is called Nichghat. The upper ghat runs from Loroghat Kastura, Narayanpur, Bagicha up to Surguja and Balrampur districts. This belt is a forest area and contains a reserve forest. It covers Sanna, Bagicha, and Narayanpur. The upper ghat is an extension plateau covering 1384 km² which is about 1200 meters above sea level and is covered by a dense forest. The elevated plateau is called "Pat". The Upper Ghat is climbed through Loroghat. Loroghat is about 4 km in length and there are three turnings that are very dangerous. Nichghat is flat in general but also has many big mountains. In Jashpur Raigarh road there are two more ghats, Jhanda ghat before Kansabel and Belaghat after Kansabel.

Major rivers in the Mahanadi basin are Ib and its tributaries such as Dorki, Maini, Kokiya, Utai, Khadung, Girma and Burhi. In the eastern part, rivers named Baki and Lava Nadi flow in the Brahmani basin. Lower Ganges part is mainly drained by Geor and Kanhar rivers. The drainage pattern is dendritic and is highly irregular, which is reflective of the topography. Irregular topography results in huge base flow through the streams and less recharge.

#REF! The total population of will be get benefited by this project road. Total number of Habitation will be get benefited by this project road (1)

1.4 Climatic Condition

Kunkuri is the hottest region in Nichghat during the summer and Pandrapat is the coldest region in Upper Ghat in the winter. It is situated between forests. It is a junction, from Raigarh and from Ambikapur or Jashpur all the people need to cross Pathalgaon first.

Weather Data 921.7 1048.3 -12

1.5 The Sub-Project Road

The road passes through plain

District:- #REF!

Road Name:- #REF!

Package No.:- CG-

Road Length:- #REF!

Start Point: latitude #REF! #REF!

longitude #REF!

End Point:- latitude #REF! #REF!

longitude #REF!

This road ends to connect a habitation Bejgapara at outside of village.

Age of the proposed road:

Existing surface details of proposed road: Earthen

Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the proposed road:

If existing PMGSY road is proposed partly or fully for upgradation/reconstruction, the following details needs to be updated in the DPR

Year and Batch of sanction

Name of the road as per sanction :

T route/L route no as per sanction : :

Sanctioned length : Km

Sanctioned cost : : Rs.

Date of completion as per OMMAS :

PCI of the road

This road is proposed for Up-gradation/Riding quality Improvement. New Construction

The road is proposed for both New Construction

Riding Quality Improvement for the chainage from ----- to ----- – Km

Sl.No. Habitation benefited Population benefited

Direct SC ST Other

1 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Total #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

#REF! #REF! #REF!

Chapter 2.Planning and Basic Design Consideration

Figure-1 Road map of india & state

Figure-2 District map

Figure-3 Block Maps showing all existing connectivity like District/block HQ, new townships, National and State highway network, mandis, hospitals, colleges, schools etc.

2.2 Preliminary alignment investigation

Strip plan showing land and alignment details

Strip plan Show In valume - II

2.3 Site Photographs

Site Photographs are enclosed here.

2.4 Road Design Brief

Proposed road is designed as per specification given in IRC SP -72 2015 for flexible pavement and reference given in MORD Rural Road Manual.

Sl.No. Location Issue Design Solutions Deficiency in view of road safety and remedies proposed

1 0 to 30000m In this section alignment passing through open area, existing BT road in average condition with 3.75m width. As the sufficient width available, B.T. Road Proposed with proper cross drainage structure with maintain proper geometrics. Ex. BT Road are in damage condition, scarify ex, BT Road till WMM Layer , Due to lack of Road width both side widening by GSB +WMM , Take WMM+BM+OGPC with Seal Coat to achive 5.50 m Road top width. as per design.

2 0 to 8075m in this section road passes from habitation area having existing CC road in with 3.75 m width From CC Road are in damage condition, required wearing coat on top of the Ex. 3.75 m Carriage way. Due to lack of Road width both side widening by M-30 to achive 5.50 m Road top width.

3 8075 to 8350m in this section earthen road. New road proposed as per design.

4 8350 to 8625m in this section existing BT road in average condition with 3.00 m width. Loosening, Levelling and Compacting the existing BT Road then provide GSB, WMM & BT as per design.

5 8625 to 8900m in this section road passes from habitation area having existing CC road in good condition with 4.0 m width No Provision.

6 8900 to 15500m in this section existing BT road in average condition with 3.00 m width. Loosening, Levelling and Compacting the existing BT Road then provide GSB, WMM & BT as per design.

2.5 Transect Walk Summary

Proposed walk was coordinate on date .................along with department engineer, Revenue officials, sarpanch and member. Incorporated the suggestion and as per site condition the road is designed with RTL average 1.05m above ground level. The traffic survey, soil investigation, borrow material availability, Topographical survey and requirment was examined accordingly. The road was designed as per provisions of IRC: SP: 72 – 2015 and Rural road specifications. it is propose to provide all weather road with 20mm OGPC Seal Coat , carrigeway width with providing .......... no. cross drainage structure 7

Chainage Existing Land Width* Additional Land Required Type of Loss Village Remarks/Suggestions

LHS RHS LHS RHS

0 7 2.5 2.5 Village Village

100 6 3 3 Village Village

350 6.5 2.75 2.75 Village Village

500 8 2 2 Village Village

600 7.5 2.25 2.25 Agl Land Agl Land 10

720 6.85 2.575 2.575 Agl Land Agl Land 605

800 7.65 2.175 2.175 Agl Land Agl Land 3250

830 8 2 2 Agl Land Agl Land 5550

900 10.25 0.875 0.875 Agl Land Agl Land

960 11 0.5 0.5 Agl Land Agl Land

1020 12 0 0 Agl Land Agl Land

1100 11.9 0.05 0.05 Agl Land Agl Land

1130 10 1 1 Agl Land Agl Land

1200 11.2 0.4 0.4 Agl Land Agl Land

1350 11.5 0.25 0.25 Agl Land Agl Land

1500 8 2 2 Agl Land Agl Land

1600 9 1.5 1.5 Agl Land Agl Land

1850 9.5 1.25 1.25 Agl Land Agl Land

2000 8 2 2 Agl Land Agl Land

2350 9 1.5 1.5 Agl Land Agl Land

2500 8.5 1.75 1.75 Agl Land Agl Land

2800 9 1.5 1.5 Agl Land Agl Land

3000 10.5 0.75 0.75 Agl Land Agl Land

3200 7.5 2.25 2.25 Agl Land Agl Land

3800 7 2.5 2.5 Village Village

4300 6 3 3 Village Village

4800 5.5 3.25 3.25 Village Village

5100 5 3.5 3.5 Village Village

7800 9 1.5 1.5 Village Village

8000 7.2 2.4 2.4 Village Village

8400 6.56 2.72 2.72 Village Village

8600 8 2 2 Village Village

9000 9.75 1.125 1.125 Village Village

9400 9.9 1.05 1.05 Village Village

9600 8.5 1.75 1.75 Village Village

1000 6.9 2.55 2.55 Village Village

10600 7.9 2.05 2.05 Village Village

10700 8 2 2 Village Village

10800 9 1.5 1.5 Village Village

1100 7.5 2.25 2.25 Village Village

11300 8 2 2 Village Village

11350 9.3 1.35 1.35 Village Village

11800 7.6 2.2 2.2 Village Village

12000 9 1.5 1.5 Village Village

12300 10.35 0.825 0.825 Village Village

12500 11 0.5 0.5 Village Village

12800 10.2 0.9 0.9 Village Village

12900 9.8 1.1 1.1 Village Village

13250 8.3 1.85 1.85 Village Village

13950 8.9 1.55 1.55 Village Village

14000 10 1 1 Village Village

14300 11.35 0.325 0.325 Village Village

14600 11.6 0.2 0.2 Village Village

14900 9 1.5 1.5 Village Village

15020 7.8 2.1 2.1 Village Village

15200 8.8 1.6 1.6 Village Village

15400 9.8 1.1 1.1 Village Village

15500 10.8 0.6 0.6 Village Village

1 Total No. of People present for the Transect walk :

Male : , Female: , Total :

2 Demographic information where the Walk was conducted :

3 No. of Govt. Employees present :

4 No. of Contractors Employees :

5 No. of participants from Minority community :

SC: , ST: Women :

6 No. of SHG members participated :

7 Enclose a separate sheet with names, designation (if Govt. Employee, or Elected Representative, SHG members) and Signatures of participants of transect walk

Transect walk done Yes No

Photographs of Transect walk attached Yes No

Transect walk summary table included Yes No

Minutes of Transect walk attached Yes No

Photographs at 100 m intervals taken Yes No

Major changes in alignment perceived Yes No

Design brief provided Yes No

Photographs of Grama Sabha attached Yes No

#REF! #REF! #REF!

Chapter 3.Topographic Survey

Topographic survey true to ground realties have been done using auto levels, and bringing out data in digital form (x,y,z format) for developing digital terrain model (DTM) and using auto level for leveling survey.

The in-house standards, work procedures and quality plan has to be prepared with reference to IRC: SP 48-1984, IRC:73-1980, IRC: SP 19-2001, IRC: SP 20-2002, IRC: SP 13-2004 (in respect of surveys for rivers/streams) and current international practices to be followed during the above survey.

The traverse consists of a series of straight lines with their lengths and intermediates angles measured very carefully. In difficult terrain, the alignment may have to be negotiated through a series of short chords, preferably, the traverse should be done with a Theodolite with Electronic Distance Measurement (EDM) and all angles measured with double reversal method. Global Positioning System (GPS) is also very useful and appropriate for preliminary survey. The GPS will give locations in coordinates all the necessary points on the traverse. GPS is very fast reasonably accurate for preliminary system and computer friendly for data transfer. Control pillars in cement concrete should be fixed at suitable interval (ranging from 500 m to 2 kms) to have control on accuracy. It also helps in repeating the survey, if required, within the control pillars.

Traverse is to be done preferably by total station having angular measurement accuracy of ± 1 sec.

Levelling has been done by auto level interval of 25m taken offset from centre four reading both side. And bearing were taken by compass survey. For cross-checking fly survery has been done. Precise levelling is a particularly accurate method of differential levelling which uses highly accurate levels and with a more rigorous observing procedure than general engineering levelling. It aims to achieve high orders of accuracy such as 1 mm per 1 km traverse. A level surface is a surface which is everywhere perpendicular to the direction of the force of gravity. An example is the surface of a completely still lake. For ordinary levelling, level surfaces at different elevations can be considered to be parallel.

Precise levelling is a particularly accurate method of differential levelling which uses highly accurate levels and with a more rigorous observing procedure than general engineering levelling. It aims to achieve high orders of accuracy such as 1 mm per 1 km traverse. A level surface is a surface which is everywhere perpendicular to the direction of the force of gravity. An example is the surface of a completely still lake. For ordinary levelling, level surfaces at different elevations can be considered to be parallel.

A level datum is an arbitrary level surface to which elevations are referred. The most common surveying datum is mean sea-level (MSL), but as hydrological work is usually just concerned with levels in a local area, we often use: An assumed datum, which is established by giving a benchmark an assumed value (e.g. 100.000 m) to which all levels in the local area will be reduced. It is not good practice to assume a level which is close to the actual MSL value, as it creates potential for confusion.

A reduced level is the vertical distance between a survey point and the adopted level datum.

A bench mark (BM) is the term given to a definite, permanent accessible point of known height above a datum to which the height of other points can be referred. It is usually a stainless steel pin embedded in a substantial concrete block cast into the ground. At hydrological stations rock bolts driven into bedrock or concrete structures can be used, but structures should be used warily as they themselves are subject to settlement. The locations of benchmarks shall be marked with BM marker posts and/or paint, and recorded on the Station History Form.List of TBM atteched in 3.6

A set-up refers the position of a level or other instrument at the time in which a number of observations are made without mooring the instrument.

The first observation is made to the known point and is termed a backsight; the last observation is to the final point or the next to be measured on the run, and all other points are intermediates

A run is the levelling between two or more points measured in one direction only. The outward run is from known to unknown points and the return run is the check levelling in the opposite direction.

A close is the difference between the starting level of the initial point for the outward run and that determined at the end of the return run. If the levels have been reduced correctly this value should be the same as the difference between the sum of the rises and falls and also the difference between the sum of the backsights and foresights.

Height of Collimation is the elevation of the optical axis of the telescope at the time of the setup.

The line of collimation is the imaginary line at the elevation.

3.4 Cross Section & Detailing

Cross sections were taken at 25 m interval and at closer interval in curved portion of the existing road. All physical features of the road were recorded.

Generally, cross section has been taken at every 25m interval, and taten four offset reading from centre both side of road. Offset distance are 0, 1.50, 3.0, 5.00, 7.50.

3.5 Data Processing

All data from topographic survey recorded by auto level were downloaded in Auto plotter and final alignment, plan, profile were prepared and presented in AutoCAD Format.

3.6 To facilitate the leveling work, bench marks, either temporary or permanent, should be established at intervals of 250 to 500 metres The levels should be connected to GTS datum.

Sl No Description Levels Location of BM/TBM Latitude Longitude Main!A1

1 TBM 100.000 On Top Nal LHS

2 TBM 102.750 On Top Culvert

3 TBM 100.760 On Top Munara

Reference pillars given Yes No Yes No

TBM with northing-easting given Yes No Yes No

Traverse survey carried out Yes No Yes No

Cross section and detailing carried out Yes No Yes No

#REF! #REF! Assistant Engineer (CGRRDA 02 Pathalgaon)

Chapter 4. Soil and Materials Survey

The soil and material investigations were done following the guidelines of IRC: SP: 20-2002 and IRC: SP: 72-2015 and other relevant IS codes. The potential sources of borrow areas for soil and quarry sites will be identified

4.2 Soil sample collection and Testing

Soil samples are to be collected along and around the road alignment at three (3) locations per km, from the adjoining borrow areas, as well as one sample is to be collected from the existing road. Soil Classification tests like grain size analysis and Atterberg’s limit are to be conducted for all the samples collected. Standard Proctor test and the corresponding 4 day soaked CBR test are to be conducted either for a minimum of one test per km for soil samples of same group or more tests due to variation of soil type. The following tests are to be conducted as detailed below:

• • Grain size analysis as per IS : 2720 (Part 4) – 1985

• • Atterberg’s limit as per IS : 2720 (Part 5) – 1985

• • Standard Proctor density test as per IS : 2720 (Part 7) – 1980

• • 4 day soaked CBR test as per IS : 2720 (Part 16) – 1987

Summary of Test

S.No. Location CBR (%) MDD gm/cc OMC (%) L.L. (%) P.I. (%) Sieve Analysis

% passing against I.S.Sieve

26.5mm 10mm 4.75mm 2mm 425u 75u

1 0 4.00 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

2 0 4.30 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

3 0 4.10 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

As the soil of CBR 3% to4% available , it is suitable for embankement construction.

4.3 Analysis of Test Results

The laboratory soaked CBR value ranges from 5% to 6% The soil laboratory test results are summarized in Table 4.1

Table 4.1 CBR values for different stretches

Sl.No. Section CBR (%) MDD Optimum Moisture Content (OMC)

4.4 Coarse and Fine Aggregates

Information regarding the source of aggregate and sand will be gathered. The stone aggregates shall be procured from Local Village where as the locally available sand shall be used. The source and the lead distance from the quarry to project site will be finalized in discussion with the PIU. The aggregates and sand where available and acceptable shall be used for bituminous work, concrete works, other pavement works.

Quarries Details

Sr no Material Location/Description Distance (From '0' point of the road)

1 Sand Local 10-15 Km

2 GSB Local 5-10 Km

3 Cement Raipur 300- 400Km

4 Metal Local 35- 40Km

4.5 Sub-soil investigation for bridges

Where the rock or some firm undisturbed soil stratum is not likely to be far below the alluvial bed of the stream , a trail pit should be dug down to such rock or firm soil . But if there is no rock or undisturbed firm soil for a great depth below the stream bed level , then the trail pit may be taken down roughly 2 to 3 meter below the lowest bed level . The location of each trail pit should be shown in the cross section of the proposed site . The trail pit section should be plotted to show the kind of soil passed through . However depth of trail pit in soil shall minimum 2 m for culverts and 3 m for small bridges .

Borrow pit suitable Yes No

SSI for existing ground Yes No

Investigation for coarse/fine aggregate Yes No

Quarry map Yes No

#REF! #REF! #REF!

Chapter 5. Traffic Survey

Road Name: #REF!

In the present scenario of new connectivity/upgradation road, 3 day, 24 hr traffic volume count has been conducted on the already completed or similar type of PMGSY road in the vicinity of the project road. The Classified Volume Count survey has been carried out in accordance with the requirements of the TOR and relevant codes (IRC: SP: 19-2001, IRC: SP: 20, IRC: SP: 72-2015).The surveys have been carried out by trained enumerators manually under the monitoring of Engineering Supervisor.

5.2 Traffic Data and Analysis

The traffic count done was classified into different vehicle category as given below:

Motorized vehicle comprising of light commercial vehicle, medium commercial vehicle, heavy commercial vehicle, trucks, buses, agricultural tractors with trailers, car, jeep, two wheelers etc.

Non- motorized vehicles comprising of cycle, rickshaw, cycle van, animal drawn vehicle etc.

The number of laden and un-laden commercial vehicles was recorded during the traffic counts. Traffic volume count for this project road was done during Harvesting season. It is assumed that peak harvesting season traffic is double of non harvesting season.

Average of 3 day traffic data is presented in Table 5.1. (adjacent road at which traffic survey carried out,

Table 5.1 Average daily Traffic data at Rd 0/2 both directions for three days (adjacent road at which traffic survey carried out,

Sl. No. Type of Vehicle Day-1 Day-2 Day-3 Av. Traffic after two year @ 6% Growth PCU CONVERSION FACTOR P.C.U.

#REF! #REF! #REF! Main!A1

1 Car, Jeep, Van,three wheeler 17 20 19 19 21 1.00 21

2 Auto Rickshaw 0 0 0 0 0 0.75 0

2 Scooters/Motorbikes 49 51 59 53 60 0.50 30 0.06

5 Tractors with trailer 41 43 51 45 51 4.50 230

6 Tractor without trailer 0 0 0 0 0 3.00 0

8 Cycle Rickshaw / Hand Cart 0 0 0 0 0 4.00 0

9 Horse cart / Bullock Cart 45 30 33 36 40 8.00 320

Total commercial vehicle per day (cvpd) 57 PCU 690

Total motorised vehicle per day 128

Total non-motorised vehicle per day 321

5.3 Traffic Growth Rate and forecast

Table 5.2 Average Annual Daily Traffic at Start Point (both ways)

Sl. No. Type of Vehicle ADT AADT Growth Rate

1 Car, Jeep, Van,three wheeler 21 26 6%

2 Auto Rickshaw 0 0 6%

3 Scooters/Motorbikes 60 75 6%

4 Bus / Minibus 3 4 6%

5 Trucks 10 12 6%

6 Tractors with trailer 51 64 6%

7 Tractor without trailer 0 0 6%

8 Cycles 100 125 6%

9 Cycle Rickshaw / Hand Cart 0 0 6%

10 Horse cart / Bullock Cart 40 50 6%

11 Pedestrian 221 275 6%

Total commercial vehicle per day (cvpd) 57

Total motorised vehicle per day 128

Total non-motorised vehicle per day 321

This Road is adjacent to ………………………………………………………………. And start which is already constructed and severing from PMGSY I .This road found traffic of T 4 found traffic survey conducted in this road because this road ……………………. Traffic will divert to this road after construction of this road.

Independent traffic survey details shall be attached where the projected traffic is more than 1 MSA duly certified by the STA. Further, Axial load survey must be carried out on such proposed roads which are to be designed for projected traffic more than 2 MSA and carriageway width of 5.5 m. The geo-tagged photographs and videography for the peak hour traffic should be attached with the DPR to justify the traffic plying on the proposed road.

{Tick the relevant box}

a) Traffic volume and mix do not vary along the road

b) Traffic volume and mix vary along the road

c) Traffic volume and mix will vary along the road in the future

d) There is a potential for through traffic using the road

e) % of loaded vehicles

4 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC AADT (During Non Harvesting Season) 0.00

5 PROJECTED ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC AADT( FOR 2 YEAR PERIOD) 0

6 PROPORTION FACTOR #DIV/0!

7 PROJECTED TRAFFIC

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

8 VEHICLE DAMAGE FACTOR VDF

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

9 TOTAL ESAL ( EQUIVALENT STANDARD AXLE LOAD)PER DAY #DIV/0!

10 CUMULATIVE ESAL OVER 10 YEARS @ 6% GROWTH RATE #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA

3 day, 24 Hr Traffic volume count Sheet

Name of Road #REF! FROM #REF!

Location 100 Mt. Block #REF! District #REF! TO #REF!

Time HCV -Truck (Laden) HCV - Truck (Unladen) HCV - Truck (Overloaded) HCV - Bus (Laden) HCV - Bus (Unladen) HCV - Bus (Overloaded) MCV -Agricultural Tractor-trailor (Laden)

Day Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

Time MCV -Agricultural Tractor-trailor (Unladen) MCV -Agricultural Tractor-trailor (Overloaded) LCV - Cars/ Vans/ Jeeps/Three Wheelers (Laded, Unladen & Overloaded) Two Wheelers Cycles Animal Drawn Cart Pedestrian 1.70

Day Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA

DESIGN OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT

As per IRC: SP:72-2015

Road Name: #REF!

Block: #REF! Distcict: #REF!

Average Daily Traffic in non Harvesting Season

HCV -Truck (Lodad) 3 MCV -Agricultural Tractor-trailor (Unlodad)) 12

HCV -Truck (Unlodad) 4 MCV -Agricultural Tractor-trailor (Overloded) 6

HCV -Truck (Overloded) 2 LCV - Cars/ Vans/ Jeeps/Three Wheelers 19

hcv - Bus (Lodad)) 3 Two Wheelers 53

hcv - Bus (Unlodad) 0 Cycles 89

hcv - Bus (Overloded) 0 Animal Drawn Cart 36

MCV -Agricultural Tractor-trailor (Lodad) 28 Pedestrian 197

Total Traffic: 255 Duration of Harvesting Season in Days ( From Local Enquiry) t = 75

Total Motorized: 130 Average Traffic During Non Harvesting Season (Considered half of the total Traffic in peak Season ) T= 255

Total Non Motorized: 125 Average Increase in Traffic During Harvesting Season nT= 255

Pedestrian : 197 Avg. Annual Daily Traffic AADT = T+((1.2 x nT x t)/365) AADT= 318

It is presumed that road will open for traffic after 2 yrs. - -

therefore ADT after 2 yrs by considering 6.0% growth rate ADT = AADT x (1+0.06)n ADT 357

PROPORTION FACTOR 1.40

For Pavement Design consider the Propotionate value of HCV, MCV & SWC out of ADT

Sr. No. Vehicle Type Propotionate Numbers Tn = (T0(1+r)n] VDF Value ESAL Per Day (T0) ESAL = (vdf x No.) Cumulative ESAL N = T0 x 365 x L x [ ((1+ 0.06)n - 1)/0.06] N = T0 x 4811 x L

1 HCV -Truck (Lodad) 3 2.58 8.696664 41840

2 HCV -Truck (Unlodad) 4 0.31 1.393264 6703

3 HCV -Truck (Overloded) 2 2.86 6.426992 30920

5 hcv - Bus (Unlodad) 0 0.31 0 0

6 hcv - Bus (Overloded) 0 2.86 0 0

7 MCV -Agricultural Tractor-trailor (Lodad) 31 0.31 9.752848 46921

8 MCV -Agricultural Tractor-trailor (Unlodad)) 13 0.02 0.269664 1297

9 MCV -Agricultural Tractor-trailor (Overloded) 7 0.344 2.3191104 11157

TOTAL ESAL 180678

Hence Adopted T-4 Traffic Category .

Desing CBR = 7-9%

Design Pavement thickness as per Fig 4 of IRC-SP - 72 - 2015

G.S.B. : #REF! mm

Thickness Modified Soil : 0 mm

Total Crust Thickness : #REF! mm

#REF! #REF! #REF!

Provide 20 mm Thick Premix carpet with seal Coat Type "B" as wearing course

DESIGN OF CONCRETE PAVEMENTS FOR RURAL ROADS AS PER IRC:SP 62-2014.

Case 1 Only wheel load stress : Case 2 Temperature and wheel load stresses without fatigue: Case 3 fatigue analysis considering load and temperature

Case 1: design traffic is <50cvpd Case 2 : traffic is in between 50 to 150 cvpd Case 3 traffic is >150 cvpd

Case 1 /2/3 (without temperature-1/ with temperature 2/with temparature and fatigue analysis-3) 1 Tyre (1- single/2 - dual) 1 Transverse joint spacing,m 4.00

Temperature Zone (1 to 6) 3 Spacing of wheels Sd (mm) 310 Ratio of L/l NO NEED TO CALC TEMP STRESS

Modulus of the subgrade reaction, k Mpa/m 42 wheel load, P kN 50 Co-efficient of thermal expansion 1E-05

Elastic modulus of concrete E, Mpa 30000 Tyre pressure, q MPa 0.80 Correction factor C

Poisson Ratio of the concrete, µ 0.15 Radius of contact, a (mm) 141.05 Design life of pavement, yrs 20

Temperature differntial, ∆T oC 19.00 Trial thickness, h m 0.20 Rate of increase of traffic 0.06

Modulus of rupture of concrete, fcr 4.22 No. of commercial vehicels per day 57 Truck with 50kN Wheel load,% 10

RESULTS FOR ONLY WHEEL LOAD CONSIDERATION RESULTS FOR WHEEL LOAD AND TEMPARATURE STRESS

Radius of relative stiffness, l m 835.44 temparature stress at edge, Mpa Pavement Composition For Case -1 Below CC Pavement in mm

Stress developed, σ, Mpa 3.1805 Wheel load Stresses at edge, Mpa

Design is Safe Total stresses, σ, Mpa GSB 150

Design is WBM-3 0

Pavement Composition For Case -2 Below CC Pavement in mm RESULTS FOR FATIGUE ANALYSIS

GSB 100 Design No.of vehicles for fatigue analysis 76084.86

WBM 75 Stresses due to wheel load,σ, Mpa

Correction factor C

stresses due to temparature,σ, Mpa

negative stress due to nonlinear temparature diffrential,σ, Mpa

Total stress for Fatigue calculation,σ, Mpa

Allowable repetititons

Cummulative fatigue damage

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Chapter 6. Hydrological Survey

Hydrological survey is necessary for design of adequate and safe Cross Drainage Structures so that the rain water can pass as per natural slope. Hydrological survey of the proposed road is based on the following observations:

Hydrological survey is necessary for idesign of adequate and safe Cross Drainage Structures so that the rain water can pass as per natural slope. The hydrological and hydraulic studies are to be conducted in accordance with IRC: SP: 13-2004 and IRC: 5-2015. Hydrological survey of the proposed road is based on the following observations:

Catchments Area

Time of Concentration

Existing Cross Drainage Structures

Drainage of road refers to the satisfactory disposal of surplus water within the road limits. The water involved may be precipitation falling on the road, surface runoff form the adjacent land, seepage water moving through sub-terrain channels, or moisture rising by capillary action. Adequate information about drainage patterns is necessary to devise an effective drainage system, which brings into focus the need for requisite studies and investigations

Drainage studies have the following principal objectives

Fixing the grade line of the road

Design of pavement and

Design of the surface/sub-surface drainage system

• Main components of drainage investigation are determination of HFL and ponded water level, depth of water table, range of tidal levels and amount of surface runoff. Besides this, for cut sections in rolling and hilly areas, it would be necessary to carry out special investigations for sub-terrain flows and seepage of irrigation water from fields situated above the road.

• Extent of studies and the data to be collected will depend on the type and scope of the project. Usually good deal of information could be collected through site inspection, simple measurements and local enquiry. Most appropriate time for such enquiries is during the stage of preliminarysurvey so that the information gathered can be of use in fixing the alignment and finalizing the broad strategy for improving the drainage. Detailed investigations could continue till the final location survey when any adjustment in the light of further data could still be made before the projects in finally ready. In the case of cut sections, investigations for seepage and sub-terrain flows may generally have to be done again at the stage of formation cut when new features may come to light warranting modifications in design or the need for special measures.

6.2 Rainfall Data

Rainfall Data as applicable for the project road were collected with maximum Rainfall occurring in the months of July/ August. .

6.3 Catchment Area

The Catchments area is to be calculated by gathering local information and topographical survey data.

6.4 Time of Concentration

Time of concentration (tc) in hours is calculated from the formula of (0.87 x L3/H)0.385, where L is distance from the critical point to the structure site in km and H is the difference in elevation between the critical point and the structure site in meters.

6.5 Existing Cross Drainage Structures

There are 18 number of cross drainage structures along the existing project road as listed below:

Table-6.1 List and condition of existing culverts

Sl. Chainage (km) Description of Existing Structure

Type & Span/ Dia. (m) Condition

1 310 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Damage Condition

2 425 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition

3 1125 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Damage Condition CD

4 1675 4.0 m Span Slab Culvert Damage Condition

5 1750 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition

6 1825 3.0 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition

7 2875 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition

8 3200 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition

9 3260 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition

10 3875 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition

11 4375 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition

12 4775 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Damage Condition

13 5050 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition

14 5250 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition

15 5575 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Good Condition

16 5875 1R X 1000mm Dia H.P.C Good Condition

17 6760 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Damage Condition

18 7190 1R X 1000mm Dia H.P.C Damage Condition

#REF! #REF! #REF!

Chapter 7. Adopted Geometric Design Standards

The geometric design standards for this project conform to PMGSY guidelines and the guidelines as stated in IRC-SP 20:2002. Recommended design standards vis-à-vis the standards followed for this road are described below. {Consultants shall review these guidelines with respect to the Expert Committee recommendations to review Standards, Specifications and Design of Rural Roads issued vide letter no. Lr.#P-17035/1/2007-Tech dated 13th October, 2010 shall be followed. Copy of circular available under circular head of www.pmgsy.nic.in.)

The classification of terrain is selected from plain/rolling/hilly/steep classification for which following criteria will be applicable.

Terrain classification Cross slope of the country

Plain 0-10% More than 1 in 10

Rolling 10-25% 1 in 10 to 1 in 4

Mountainous 25-60% 1 in 4 to 1 in 1.67

Steep Greater than 60% Less than 1 in 1.67

7.3 Design Speed

The proposed design speed along this project road will be selected from the following table:

Road classification Plain terrain Rolling terrain Mountainous terrain Steep terrain

Ruling Min. Ruling Min. Ruling Min. Ruling Min.

Rural Roads (ODR) 65 50 50 40 30 25 25 20

Rural Roads (VR) 50 40 40 35 25 20 25 20

7.4 Right of Way (ROW)

The requirement of ROW for this road is as follows (as specified in IRC-SP 20:2002):

Road classification Plain and Rolling Terrain Mountainous and Steep Terrain

Open Area Built-up Area Open Area Built-up AreaBuilt-up Area

Normal Range Normal Range Normal Exceptional Normal Exceptional

Rural roads (ODR and VR), (m) 15 15-25 15 15-20 12 12 12 9

7.5 Roadway Width

As the road is link road way width is reduced to 9.0m

Carriageway (m) Roadway Width (m)

Plain and Rolling Mountainous and Steep

Desired Minimum

7.6 Carriageway Width

The width of carriageway for this project road is 3.75m.

It is proposed to have 1.875 m wide shoulder in open area and in builtup area as per space available.

It is proposed to have 1.875 m wide shoulder as the case may be on both sides of which at least 1.00 m is hard shoulder with well compacted unscreened gravel.

Shoulder width will be one half of the difference between the roadway width and carriageway width. The earthen/hard shoulder can be proposed as per the site requirements.

7.8 Roadway width at cross-drainage structures

The roadway width at culvert locations for this road is 7.50 m in plain terrain.

7.9 Sight Distance

The safe stopping sight distance is applicable in the geometric design. The sight distance values for this road as per IRC recommendations are presented below:

Design Speed (km/hr) Safe Stopping Sight Distance (m)

In built-up area, in sharp curves necessary signages will be provided.

7.10 Radius of Horizontal Curve

According to IRC recommendations/standards, the minimum radius of horizontal curve for this project road is given below:

Terrain Category Radius of Horizontal Curve (m)

Ruling Minimum Absolute Minimum

Mountainous 30 20

To minimize extra land arrangement, minimum radius used is 20 m and design speed in these curves are also restricted to 20 km/hr.

7.11 Camber & Super elevation

A camber to be adopted on this road section is given below. The maximum super elevation is 5.0% for this project road.

Surface type Camber (%)

Low rainfall (Annual rainfall <1000mm) High rainfall (Annual rainfall >1000mm)

Earth road 4.0 (1 in 25) 5.0 (1 in 20)

WBM Gravel Road 3.5 (1 in 28.5) 4.0 (1 in 25)

Thin bituminous Road 3.0 (1 in 33.33) 3.5 (1 in 28.57)

Rigid Pavement 2.0 (in in 50) 2.5 (1 in 40)

7.12 Vertical Alignment

The present road is in plain/hilly terrain and vertical alignment has been designed well within ruling gradient. (Longitudinal gradients should be as per the Expert Committee recommendations to review Standards, Specifications and Design of Rural Roads issued vide letter no. Lr.#P-17035/1/2007-Tech dated 13th October, 2010 shall be followed. Copy of circular available under circular head of www.pmgsy.nic.in.)

Generally, minimum gradient of 0.3% for drainage purpose is considered for designing the vertical alignment of this road.

7.13 Vertical Curves

For satisfactory appearance, the minimum length of vertical curve for different design speed is given in IRC-SP 20:2002 and Expert committee recommendations of PMGSY roads to be referred. Vertical curves are to be designed to provide the visibility at least corresponding to the safe stopping sight distance. Valley curves to be designed for headlight sight distance.

7.14 Side slope

Side slope for this rural road embankment height is less than 1.05m from gruound level. is given in the table below.

Condition Slope (H:V)

Embankment in silty/sandy/gravel soil 2:1,

Embankment in clay or clayey silt or inundated condition 2.5:1 to 3:1

Cutting in silty/sandy/gravelly soil 1:1 to 0.5:1

Radius of Curve (m) Upto 20 21 - 60 Above 60

Cutting in disintegrated rock or conglomerate 0.5:1 to 0.25:1

Cutting in soft rock like shale 0.25:1 to 0.125:1

Cutting in medium rock like sandstone, phyllite 0.083:1 to 0.0625:1

Cutting in hard rock like quartzite, granite Near vertical

7.15 Extra Widening of Pavement

The Extra Widening of Pavement at Curve as is given below:

Radius of Curve (m) Upto 20 21 - 60 61 - 100 101 - 300 Above 300

Extra Widening for 3.75 m wide single lane carriageway (m) 0.9 0.6 Nil Nil Nil

Extra Widening for 5.5 m wide intermediate lane carriageway (m) 1.25 1.0 0.8 0.5 Nil

#REF! #REF! #REF!

Chapter 8. Alignment Design

The basic aim of highway design is to identify technically sound, environment-friendly and economically feasible highway alignment. The most appropriate alignment is to be proposed considering the effect of climate change and past history of natural disasters in the area. The selection of the alignment is to be made after economic, social and environmental analysis, the details of the same is presented in succeeding chapters. The ensuing sections deals with obligatory points, which control highway alignment, design of cross-section, highway geometric design & methodology, design of miscellaneous items.

The main components included in the highway design are:

Cross-sectional elements

Horizontal alignment

Vertical profile

Junctions and/or Interchanges

Miscellaneous items

i. The road alignment is to be planned considering following aspects:

ii. Finalization of road alignment, their design and construction methodology based upon the recommendations of the geologist, geotechnical engineer, hydrologist, soil conservation experts contained in their reports

iii. Alignment of the road on sun facing side of the hill

iv. Efforts to avoid series of hair-pin bends on steep slopes

v. Staggering the location of the hair-pin bends so that they are not aligned one above the other

vi. Ensuring safe horizontal and vertical distance from river banks and the water level

vii. Avoidance of hill cutting in the form of huge vertical cuts and adoption of benching for mitigating slope instability

viii. Adoption of the balance and cut and fill methodology where possible

ix. Study of the roads already constructed in the immediate vicinity to better understand the behaviour of the hill slopes along the roads

x. Excavation of bore holes at major change in pavement condition or in deflection readings (for up-gradation works), or at 2 km intervals, whichever is lesser

xi. Excavation as required where major changes in soil condition or change in strata is observed

xii. Testing of samples from the bore holes to determine suitability of various materials for use in widening of existing embankments or in new pavement structure

xiii. In case of hill roads, identification of the dumping sites in the DPR so as to use them for developing parks, playground, parking area etc.

xiv. Consultation with the local public on the hazards occurring in the area in the past

xv. Study of possible alternate alignments

8.2 Horizontal alignment

Table 8.1 – Features of Horizontal Alignment

Chainage Length Description Reason for deviation from existing alignment, if necessary

From (km) To (km) (km)

0 #REF! #REF! N.A No existing alignment deviated

a) Centre line of the existing and proposed horizontal alignment coincide

b) Centre line of the existing and proposed horizontal alignment deviate at certain sections

Chainage LHS Existing alignment RHS Chainage shift Approx land required (m)

No existing alignment shift

Figure 8.1 Schematic diagram showing location and offsets from existing alignment

Table 8.2 – Horizontal Curve details

Horizontal curve details show in voll-II

Curve No. IP Chainage Radius Ls Speed S.E. Def Angle Lc Curve Length total Hand of Curve

(m) (m) (Kmph) D M S (m) (m)

8.3 Vertical alignment

Table 8.3 – Vertical Curve Details (Example)

Sl. NO. Chainage (m) Level of pvi Length of curve Type of curve Grade in (%) Grade out (%) Grade difference (%) Chainage Level

St. of Curve End of Curve St. of Curve End of Curve

2 no vertical curve required

8.4 Design of Junctions

The proposed alignment intersects cross roads and forms junctions. The locations of junctions are given below:

Table 8.4 – List intersections, type and proposed modifications

Sl. Type of intersection Location (km) Exiting condition Proposed modification

1 Tee-junction 0.00 BT Road Bell mouth joint provide

2 Tee-junction #REF! BT Road Bell mouth joint provide

#REF! #REF! #REF!

Chapter 9. Pavement Design

Considering the sub grade strength, projected traffic and the design life, the pavement design for low volume PMGSY roads is to be carried out as per guidelines of IRC: SP: 72 – 2015, IRC SP:77-2008 “Design of Gravel Road”, IRC SP:62-2014 “Cement Concrete roads” and IRC:37-2018 “Guidelines for Design of Flexible Pavement for roads having higher category of traffic. In built up area for hygienic and safety reasons, C.C. pavement to be provided with a hard shoulder and drain appropriate line drain. Drainage plan needs to be attached with the DPR.

i. Pavement roughness measurement using bump integrator (or alternative calibrated instrument) and measurement of rutting, cracking and ravelling

ii. Measurement of road deflections utilizing the Benkleman Beam Deflection Test

iii. CBR tests at sufficient intervals to indicate extent and severity of the problem when pavements are too distressed to give meaningful deflection results

iv. Survey for assessment of the surface, sub-surface and roadside drainage condition of the road section

v. Detailed subsurface investigations for all the road sections where there has been subgrade failure

vi. Overlay thickness clause2.2.3 of IRC SP72:2015 should be referred.

9.2 Pavement Design Approach

9.2.1 Design Life

A design life of 10 years is to be considered for the purpose of pavement design of flexible and granular pavements.

9.2.2 Design Traffic

The average annual daily traffic (AADT) for the opening year as well as the total commercial vehicle per day (CVPD) is to be presented in Table 5.2.

9.2.3 Determination of ESAL applications

Only commercial vehicles with a gross laden weight of 3 tonnes or more are considered. The design traffic was considered in terms of cumulative number of standard axles to be carried during the design life of the road. The numbers of commercial vehicles of different axle loads are converted to number of standard axle repetitions by a multiplier called the Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF). An indicative VDF value was considered as the traffic volume of rural road does not warrant axle load survey.

For calculating the VDF, the following categories of vehicles was considered as suggested in paragraph 3.4.4 of IRC: SP 72-2015.

• Laden heavy/medium commercial vehicles

• Un-laden /partially loaded heavy/medium commercial vehicles

• Over loaded heavy/medium commercial vehicles

Vehicle type Laden Un-laden /Partially laden

Indicative VDF values considered 10% of laden MCV and 10% laden HCV as overloaded & given below:

Lane distribution factor (L) for Single lane road = 1.0 Cumulative ESAL application = To x 4811 x L, where To = ESAL application per day. The Cumulative ESAL application for the project road as per paragraph 3.5 of IRC: SP: 72 – 2015 is presented in Annexure

9.2.4 Subgrade CBR

9.3 Design Alternatives

Design alternatives considered

Chainage Design alternatives considered

Pavement Shoulder Soil stabilization and use of locally available marginal materials. Specify design alternative selected Justification

Flexible Rigid Earthen full width Hard Full width Hard shoulder 1.00 m each side

#REF! Yes Yes Yes Yes

#REF! Yes Yes Yes Yes

9.4 Pavement composition

i. Flexible Pavement

ii. The designed pavement thickness and composition is to be calculated by referring Figure 4 (Pavement design catalogue) of IRC: SP: 72 – 2015. The ratio between heavy commercial vehicles and medium commercial vehicles as given in Chapter 5 should be maintained as far as possible.

The pavement layers provided are given below:

Table 5.2 Average Annual Daily Traffic at Road

S. No. HCV MCV LCV Car/Jeep Mcycles Carts

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

1 Total Motorised Vehicle

2 Total Non Motorised Vehicle

3 Average Daily Traffic ADT

4 Annual Average Daily Traffic AADT (During Non Harvesting Season)

5 Projected Annual Average Daily Traffic AADT( For 2 Year Period)

6 Proportion Factor

7 Projected Traffic

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

8 Vehicle Damage Factor VDF

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

9 Total ESAL ( Equivalent Standard Axle Load )Per Day

10 Cumulative ESAL Over 10 Years @ 6% Growth Rate

Layers Items Thickness for pavement Thickness of Pavement in Widening portion

Top Layer/Surface course Premix Carpet with Seal Coat/ SDBC/BC /Surface dressing 20mm

Bituminous layer BM/DBM/BC -

Base Layer WMM 150 mm

Grading II /WBM 0.495

Sub – Base Layer Granular Sub-base 150 mm

Total thickness 320mm

Top layer of WBM is to be treated with bituminous surface.

Evaluation of Subgrade Strength

i) Design CBR = 5.64%

PAVEMENT THICKNESS AND COMPOSITION Quality of Subgrade Class Range (CBR%)

T1 : 10,000 to 30000 ESAL applications

T2 : 30,000 to 60,000 ESAL applications Very Poor S1 2%

T3: 60,000 to 1,00,000 ESAL applications Poor S2 3% - 4%

T4: 1,00,000 to 2,00,000 ESAL applications Fair S3 5% - 6%

T5: 2,00,000 to 3,00,000 ESAL applications Good S4 7% - 9%

T6: 3,00,000 to 6,00,000 ESAL applications Very Good S5 10% - 15%

T9: 15,00,000 to 20,00,000 ESAL applications

For commulative ESAL applications of 180678 reffering to to the Traffic category in the

range 2,00,000 to 3,00,000 and the subgrade category of CBR 7% to 9 %, Fig 4, IRC:SP:72-2015

Sub Grade )= 0 mm

GSB (CBR not less than 20, in exceptional cases may be relaxed to 15= #REF! mm

Bituminous surface treated WBM/CRMB #REF! mm

Premix Carpet with Seal Coat/ SDBC/BC /Surface dressing #REF! mm

Total Crust = #REF! mm

FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT

Chainage Length (in M) Design CBR GSB (in mm) WBM (in mm) WBM (in mm) PMC REMARK

Chainage Length (in M) Remark GSB (in mm) Width CC M-30 Grade (in mm)

iii. Rigid Pavement Design Pavement thickness as per Clause no. 1502 Page no.398 MORD Specipication

Top Layer/Surface course M-30 200mm

Base Layer DLC/WMM/WBM -

Sub – Base Layer Granular Sub-base 150mm

Total thickness 350mm

CC pavement design as per IRC:SP:62-2004

9.5 Embankment Design

As there is no high embankement in proposed road , hence Need not required to design embankement

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Chapter 10. Design of Cross Drainage Works

On the basis of hydrological survey, number of new cross drainage works are recommended for the project road as listed below. {Consultants shall review these guidelines with respect to the Expert Committee guidelines “Review of Geometric Design Standards for Rural Roads in Hill Areas (meeting at Mussorie – 29-30 November 2007) and Review of Geometric Design Standards for Rural Roads in Plains}

10.2 Hydrological Design

Agricultural conduits, which basically act as balancers, have also been provided as listed below in Table 10.2. The existing structures in poor condition that are proposed for replacement as listed below. Agricultural conduits, which basically act as balancers, have also been provided as listed below.

Sr. No. Chainage (m) Span (m) C.A. (Ha) Q= CM¾ where C=14 M = CA in Sq Km As per Article 7.6.1 of IRC SP -20 WaterWay Area Required = CA (Ha)/10.9 Width of Opening Provided Height of OpeningProvided Waterway area Provided (Sqm) Bed Level RTL Foundation Level

10.3 Design Feature

Design Standards for culverts is to be been prepared based on standard codes and guidelines of IRC: SP: 20: 2002 and similar type of ongoing projects. General features of the designed cross drainage structures are given below:

1 For hume pipe culvert, minimum road width has been taken as 7.50m,

Width of culvert : 7.50 m with parapet.

Width of Bridge: 5.5 m with parapet

10.4 Justification for retaining/widening and replacement of culverts

There are four no eisting culvrt and four no. of field crossing along theproject road are present as follows

10.5 Hydraulic calculation for Culvert

The design discharge is to be calculated by the rational method considering peak runoff from catchment using the formula,

Q = 0.028 x P x A x Ic

Where P = Coefficient of Run Off for the catchments characteristics, A = Catchments Area in Hectares & Ic = Rainfall Intensity

ii. Small bridge-site length of which exceeds 15 m to be jointly visited by STA and S.E. Design – as per IRC: SP: 20-2002 & IRC: SP:13-2004 and relevant IRC Codes for Bridges.

iii. Causeways and submersible bridges – Design to be done as per IRC: SP: 20-2002 and SP-82:2008.

Detailed hydraulic calculation of all replaced and proposed new culverts and attached as Annexure-2 of this report.

List of c/d works proposed/upgraded, type, location, span/dia in a tabular form. This should connect to the decisions taken during transect walk.

Table 10.2 Proposed Culverts

Sl. No. Chainage Type of Culvert Span/Dia

1 310 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Replacement CD

2 1125 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Replacement Abs. CD'!A1

3 1675 6.0 m Span Slab Culvert Replacement

4 4015 1R X 1000mm Dia H.P.C Proposed

5 4775 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Replacement

6 6760 1.50 m Span Slab Culvert Replacement

7 7190 1R X 1000mm Dia H.P.C Replacement

#REF! #REF! #REF!

Chapter 12. Land Requirement

The existing road is generally an WBM road in poor condition, rest is earthen road in some strech. Thus the project road is a new connectivity road. The existing Right of Way (ROW) is varying from 6.0 m to 8.0m.

12.2 Proposed ROW

The width of carriageway is to be considered as 3.75 m / 5.5 m in accordance with the IRC-SP 20: 2002. The total roadway width is limited to 7.5 m/9 m. The proposed ROW generally varies from 12 m – 15 m depending upon the embankment height and the proposed ROW is even less than 10 m in some stretches of habitation area and in areas having tree plantation.

12.3 Additional Land

Local administration and local panchayat need to apprise the villagers about requirement of minor areas in places for development of the road. Villagers are generally highly enthusiastic during site visits for selection of the road. Table 12.1 provides the chainage-wise additional land required.

Table 12.1 Additional Land Required

Sl. No. Chainage Width of Land Required in m Comments

#REF! #REF! #REF!

Chapter 13. Utility shifting/relocation

13.1 Existing utilities

There is no existing utilities that require relocation along the project road. That were connect to the decisions taken during transect walk.

13.2 List of departments responsible for utility shifting-

a) Electric pole :- C.S.E.B.

b) Hand pump :- P.H.E.

13.3 Rules pertaining to shifting of utilities N.R

13.4 An estimate for relocation of utilities is given below in Table 13.1

{Provide an estimate with breakdown of costs for relocation of utilities}

Table 13.1 Estimated Cost for Relocation of Utilities

Sl. No. Utility Type Qty Estimated Rate Estimated Cost

1 Electricpole #REF! 25000 #REF!

2 Transformer #REF! 250000 #REF!

3 Handpump #REF! 100000 #REF!

Estimated Total Cost #REF!

GST @ 18% #REF!

#REF! #REF! #REF!

Chapter 17. New Technology/Green Technology

17.1 New Technology/Green Technology

In order to promote cost-effective, locally relevant, ‘Green’ and fast construction technologies in the construction of rural roads, using New materials / Waste materials / Locally available materials, NRIDA has issued ‘Guidelines on Technology Initiatives’, in May 2013. The States have been asked to propose at least 10% of the length of annual proposals using any of the new technologies, for which specifications of Indian Roads Congress (IRC) are already available and an additional length of 5% of annual proposals with any of the new technologies for which specifications of Indian Roads Congress are not available, including materials accredited by IRC.

The states need to follow the above guidelines while submitting the proposals under PMGSY. The details of some of the materials/ technologies for which IRC specifications are available and for which specifications are not available are given below:

Technologies with IRC Specifications

• Lime stabilization

• Cement stabilization

• Bitumen stabilization

• Use of Fly Ash/Pond Ash

• Lime fly ash stabilized Bases

• Use of fly ash in cement for concrete structures.

• Roller Compacted Concrete Pavements

• Cold Mix Technology

• Waste Plastic Utilization

• Bio Engineering Measures

Technologies with No IRC Specifications

• Locally available /Marginal materials, Brick aggregates etc.

• Blast furnace Slag/ Steel Slag /Zinc Slag

• Jute / Coir Geo-textiles

• Rice husk, Baggage

• IRC Accredited materials like RBI 81, Terrazyme, Powercem, Zycosil, RoadCem etc.

• Quarry Waste Materials

• Slope Stabilization, Bamboo Piling etc.

• Cell Filled Concrete, Paneled Concrete

Justification for selection of technology

Check list for Adoption of New Technology/Green Technology

1 Usage of local materials

Whether local and marginal materials are proposed for usage in sub base, base layers and in construction of support structures. Please elaborate

2. Soil and pavement stabilization

2.1 What are the soil stabilization measures proposed for poor sub grade and side slopes and in poor drainage areas

2.2 In case of non-availability of good GSB / base course material what is the alternate option proposed

2.3 Have sub base and/or base course stabilization measures proposed

3. Pavement surfacing

3.1Whether cold emulsion is being proposed in the surface paving

3.2 Is Warm Mix Asphalt(WMA) proposed in the pavement

4. New Materials & Green Technology

4.1 Please list out all the new materials and green technology being proposed in the DPR

4.2 What provision has been kept for carbon sink for offsetting carbon emissions

5. Carbon Emission Reduction Plan

5.1 Has Carbon Emission Reduction Plan been attached?

5.2 Does this Plan cover the three R’s, namely, Reduce, Recycle and Reinvent

#REF! #REF! #REF!

Chapter 18. Climate Resiliency

18 Climate resilient infrastructure endures the impacts of climate related events. Changes in the climate involve changes in temperature, precipitation, melting of glaciers, storm activity, river flow, wind speeds and much more. Road infrastructure being totally exposed to the vagaries of nature is highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, the adverse effects of which apart from the physical damage to the road network can affect a country’s economy

Climate change impacts the road infrastructure in various ways: high precipitation and flooding increases the risk of rendering the drainage system inadequate resulting in damage to the road drainage structures, scouring of bridge foundations, breaching of road embankments, submergence of road sections, landslides, rock falls and erosion resulting in disruption of traffic, road closure for indefinite period and weakening of pavement; and exposure of areas along the river basins to flooding causing frequent closure of the roads. Floods may lead rivers to change their course, thus rendering previously safe roads at risk of being flooded.

In the view of above, to ensure increased resilience and environmental sustainability of the rural road various climate resilient measures are proposed for this roads project. List of all such measures is as follow:

Check List of DPR incorporating Climate Resilience

1 Availability in the DPR of following documents /studies undertaken

1.1 Topographical, geological and geomorphologic maps

1.2 Geotechnical studies

1.3 Hydrological studies

1.4 Hazard data base and inventory, susceptibility and hazard zoning maps, as available

1.5 Any information available pertaining to the site

2 Road Geometrics

2.2 Curves, hair pin bends, etc

2.3 Hair pin bends – gradient, radius and location – whether staggered and availability of adequate width along with stable and gentle hill slope

2.4 Road Alignment – alternate alignments considered and whether the selected alignment is sun facing, avoids steep hill cutting, located sufficiently away from river bank and adequately raised to avoid inundation by river flood

2.5 Whether the proposed alignment crosses steep channels subjected to debris flow

3.1 plain, rolling, mountainous or steep

3.2 topographical constraints such as cliffs, ravines and gorges

3.3 dip of the rock, joints and fractures

4.1 profile as identified from the natural and artificial slopes such as mule tracks and footpaths, terracing for agriculture/horticulture

4.2 slope stability and location of earlier landslides

4.3 whether the slopes are wet

4.4 possibility of avalanches and snow drifts

5 Soil Characteristics

Soil- type, depths and tendency to erode of the strata, geology of the area

6 Drainage characteristics (whether existing protection works adequate or need enhancement)

6.1.1 Side drains- type, size and whether lined

6.2 Sub-surface

6.2.1 Catch water/intercepting drains – whether required and provided with justifications

6.3 susceptibility to flooding and if so, flood levels and river training provision incorporated

7 Land use of water shed/catchment area

7.1 River/stream characteristics

7.1.1 whether meandering or straight

7.1.2 banks erodible or non-erodible

7.1.3 river bed soil classification

7.1.4 discharge and velocity of the flow

7.1.5 recorded maximum flood discharge and HFL at proposed site

7.2 Catchment Area characteristics

7.2.1 slope of the catchment area

7.2.2 Vegetation cover – extent and type

7.3 Land use within the catchment area ( at present and expected in future)

8 Climatic Conditions

8.1 Temperature

8.4 Fog conditions

8.5 Exposure to Sun

8.6 Unusual weather conditions such as cloudburst/ flash floods

9 Design and Construction

9.1 Whether huge vertical cuts avoided, benching adopted and quantity of earthwork accordingly taken in BOQ

9.2 Whether the quantity of earthwork in excavation has been considered by keeping the cut face of the hill slope as per the soil classification shown in the cross-sections

9.3 Has the choice of manual/mechanized cutting factored in the terrain condition (briefly comment)

9.4 Whether the item taken for excavation in rock specifies, ‘blasting prohibited’, and rate for the item accordingly taken in BOQ

9.5 Whether provision kept in the BOQ for use of useful excavated material in the project itself

9.6 What efforts made to balance cut and fill methodology

9.7 Location of dumping sites and proposed development of these sites as playground/park /parking area, etc. (Payment for the quantity of excavated material actually dumped at site to be made based upon initial and final levels of the dumping site)

9.8 Whether the size and type of support structures provided are adequate and are justified with proper documentation, site conditions, etc.

9.10 Have the intensity, duration and frequency of rainstorms/cloudbursts occurring as a result of climate change considered in the design of robust slope stabilization measures and assessing provisions related to drainage

9.11 Has the capacity of cross drainages fixed based upon the size of the catchment area, its characteristics and the rainfall pattern and due allowance made for possible blockages

9.12 Have the CDs been proposed at natural drainage crossings and not allowed water to continue beyond them thereby overloading the side drains, etc.

9.13 What efforts have been made to provide precast culverts/side drains and of standardized sections

9.14 In case a culvert location has likely diversion potential due to huge debris flow what provisions have been kept to accommodate overtopping without washing

out the structure or diverting flow down the road

9.15 Is there a possibility of some of the nallahs/gullies widening and deepening as a result of higher intensity and frequency of rainfall? If so, what provisions have been kept to mitigate this problem

9.16 Have provisions been made for scour checks in side drains if the slope exceeds 4%

9.17 In case of soft hill profile has the height of vertical face of side drain increased to function as a toe wall

9.18 Have the hair pin bends been provided with CDs both on the lower and upper arms along with provision of escape drain on the upper arm

9.19 Is there provision for bio engineering measures with or without civil engineering measures at locations expecting shallow seated slope failure

9.20 Is provision kept for covering (stabilizing) cut and fill slopes with vegetation, to minimize surface instability problems as well as minimize surface erosion

9.21 How is the pavement proposed to be made durable in reaches passing through saturated soils/ black cotton soils or such poor soils, areas subjected to flooding, etc.

10 Likely foundation strata for major structures

11 Detailed Field Investigations carried out

11.1 Geotechnical, subsurface and drainage investigations

11.2 Diagnostic assessment of the landslides and their likely significance

11.3 For flood risk assessment the source of flood water, the route it follows and the assets likely to be affected

12 Any other information

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Chapter 19. Analysis of Rates

Rates for various item of works of the project have been derived from the “Schedule of Rates 2025 for Road works, Culvert works & Carriage etc. PMGSY and “Addendum & Corrigendum to Schedule of Rates” effective from 2025 However in general the basic rates of material have been taken from As per SOR . The rates of different items have been worked out inclusive of all labour charges, hire charges of Tools & Plants, Machineries and all other cost estimates for the item of work, overhead and contractor’s profit @ 12.5% and 1% cess on these. In respect of Long Span Bridges, the overhead and contractor’s profit should be at the rate of 20%. Further, the GST should not be included in the individual items and it should be included @ 18% of total project cost separately in the abstract estimate.

19.2 Basic Rate of Material

The basic rates for stone materials & river bed materials have been taken from

For bituminous materials, basic rate at (location) for equivalent viscosity grade bitumen and for emulsion the basic rate of (location) has been considered as suggested in from

Basic rate of other materials like coarse & fine sand, cement are as per the latest from

Basic rate of steel materials at sub-divisional office has been considered in analysis after adding cost of carriage, loading & unloading.

19.3 Lead for Materials

For stone aggregates and sand, lead from source to work site is calculated from the district map and block level map of DRRP and finalizing the same in discussion with PIU. The supply of different materials to worksite is by road. Lead for bituminous & steel materials are similarly obtained using SOR. The PIU should certify that the leads of materials used in the DPR are shortest and economical.

#REF! #REF! #REF!

Chapter 20. Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate of project is to be arrived on the following basis

• Selection of Items of work

• Estimation of item wise quantities

• Analysis of Rates

• Maintenance Cost per KM, per Year to be paid as per predeclared rate on PBMC to contractor as per carriageway width for Flexible Pavement and Rigid Pavement separately.

20.2 Estimation of Quantities

All the relevant road and structure work Items will be identified as per survey, design and drawings. Major item of works considered are given below:

• Site clearance, dismantling and earthwork

• Pavement works (GSB, WBM, WMM, Bituminous layers)

• Cross drainage structure works

• Drainage and protective works

• Utility relocation

• Road safety and furniture

• Maintenance works

Quantity of earthwork is to be derived from the proposed cross section drawings. Volume of cut and fill is to be obtained directly using the design package software. Quantity derived from software is to be manually verified. The details are to be provided chainage wise in Tabular form for total cut and fill volume. The soil obtained from roadway excavation shall be used for construction of embankment and shall be paid as per item no.4. All other quantities will be computed from the drawings of finished road, miscellaneous drawings & drawings of CD Structures.

Table of cut and fill volume enclosed here.

20.3 Abstract of Cost

Unit rates to be derived by using the “Schedule of Rates for Road Works, Culvert works and Carriage etc. PMGSY. The abstract of Cost estimate is given in the Table below.

20.4 Maintenance

Cost of Annual Maintenance for five years after completion of project, cost of 6th year renewal coat and cost of further five years annual maintenance after the completion of 6th year renewal coat are to be estimated as per the PMGSY-III Guidelines. Different activities of ordinary repairs are to be done as and when required.

DPR Consultant Sub Engineer (PIU, PWD -.ANTAGARH) S.D.O(PIU, PWD -.ANTAGARH)

Chapter 21. Construction Program

Assuming that the Construction of the Batch – {Insert Batch No.} roads will start from Madagaon construction progrmme is enclosed here. This is a high rainfall area and rainy season extends from June to September. However, the construction program is based for a total working period of 12months, considering the program set out by MoRD. Generally, dry working season of about 12 months are required for construction of PMGSY roads. However, works will be affected for the monsoon during the month June to September. It is anticipated that some activity like collection of materials, CD works etc. will continue in monsoon period also.

19.2 Realistic duration

The whole construction work completed in a year including reany season as per rural road manual.

#REF! #REF! #REF!

Name of Road:- #REF!

1 Site & Lab. Establishment

2 Site Clearence

3 Initial Survey

6 Earthen Shoulder

10 Hard Shoulder

16 Protection Work

17 Road Furniture

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA

Summary Sheet of Existing Road

Road Name : #REF! Block #REF!

Length : #REF! Km District #REF!

Sr. No. Chainage Road crust Total Crust Available Width of Crust (in M) Width of road up to Shoulder (in M) Condition of road Proposal Main

From To G-III G-II CC GSB

(M) (M) (in m) (in m) (in m) (in m) (in m)

1 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

2 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

3 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

4 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

5 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

6 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

7 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

#REF! #REF! #REF!

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA

GENERAL ABSTRACT

Length of Road: #REF! Km Name of Road : #REF!

Block: #REF! District : #REF!

Sr. No. Particulars Details Total Cost in Lacs (Rs) Incl.18% GST

1 Flexible Pavement #REF! #REF!

2 Rigid Pavement #REF! #REF!

3 Protection Work - #REF! Main!A1

4 Cost Of Cross Drainage works 1 Nos. #REF! Abs. CD'!A1

6 Utility shifting/relocation - #REF!

Total Cost of Road Project Rs. #REF! Lacs

Cost Per KM Rs. #REF! Lacs

Maintenance Cost for 5 Years Rs. #REF! Lacs

Utility shifting/relocation #REF! Lacs

Total Cost of Road Project including maintainance Rs. #REF! Lacs

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA

PACKAGE SUMMARY

State: Chhattisgarh Package No. (Rs in Lakhs)

S. N. District Block Link Route No. Name of the Road Type of Proposal Proposed length (In Km) Cost of Pavement Details of C.D Cost Of Protection Work Others Total estimated Cost Average Cost per Km

From To *N/U BT CC Total No. Cost Const Maint. Const Maint.

1 #REF! #REF! 0 #REF! #REF! N #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 7 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Including 18% GST Lacs #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Cost Sharing Details :-

ITEM MORD STATE TOTAL

Prepared By:- Const.(60:40) #REF! #REF! #REF!

Maintenance Cost ( 0:100) 0.00 #REF! #REF! #REF!

Cost due to higher spesification ( 0:100 ) 0.00 #REF! #REF!

Scrutinized By:-

Technical Scrutiny done by :- Coordinator:-

Proforma C (2021)- Part-1

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA (PMGSY-IV)

CHECKLIST FOR PIU & STA

( For Indvidual Road Works )

Final Proposal Details (To be filled by PIU & Verified by STA)

1. Location State: CHHATTISGARH District : #REF! Block: #REF!

3. Name of the Road (as per OMMAS) #REF!

4. Planning (Check from CNCPL ,GeoSadak and Gati Shakti)

a Is the road a part of DRRP and Approved CNCPL (Mark ✔ as appropriate) Yes ✔ No

b Is the road proposal uploaded on GeoSadak and Gati Shakti (Mark ✔ as appropriate) Yes ✔ No

Screenshot of the proposed alignment from the GeoSadak and Gati Shakti to be attached with the DPR

c Indicate coordinates of Starting and Ending point of the Proposed Road Starting Point Ending Point

Latitude #REF! #REF!

Longitude #REF! #REF!

d Details regarding the components of the candidate road?

Component Roads DRRP Road Number Road Name DRRP Length considered (km)

Component Road 1

Component Road 2

Component Road 3 `

e Through Route/ MRL/Link Number T - OR MRL- OR L-

f Name of benefited habitations (benefited habitation report generated from OMMAS to be attached with the DPR)

S.No. Habitation Name Habitation served with Population S.No. Habitation Name Habitation served with Population

SC Population % of SC Population with respect to Total Population ST population % of ST Population with respect to Total Population Other than SC/ST Population Total Population SC Population % of SC Population with respect to Total Population ST population % of ST Population with respect to Total Population Other than SC/ST Population Total Population

1 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 5

g Names of facilities along the Candidate road (For PMGSY-IV facilities, report generated from OMMAS to be attached with the DPR)

Sl. No. Name of Facilities Sl. No. Name of Facilities Sl. No. Name of Facilities Sl. No. Name of Facilities

h Utility value

j Whether the proposed road leads to (Mark ✔ as appropriate) MDR SH NH ODR/VR

5. Eligible CNCPL length (km) -

6. Total Proposed Length (km) - #REF! In Built up area (km) - #REF! In Open Area (km) - #REF!

7. Is there any variation between eligible CNCPL length and Proposed length (Mark ✔ as appropriate) Yes No

If Yes, Reason for variation to be mentioned

Only for PMGSY (Stage-I) sanctioned road

8. Existing status of proposed road (PMGSY/ Non-PMGSY Portion)

Chainage Length (km) Year of Construction* Corresponding existing PCU/day Corresponding Design Traffic Category

Note : *Actual date of completion of previous construction/ upgradation.

9. Existing Surface Status of proposed road

Existing Surface Status

Track/ Earthen Gravel/ Moorum/GSB Brick Soling CC

Chainage Length (km) Chainage Length (km) Chainage Length (km) Chainage Length (km)

From To From To

#REF! #REF! - - - - #REF! #REF! #REF!

#REF! #REF! #REF!

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Total Total Total Total Total #REF!

10. Type of proposal

Chainage Length (km)

New Construction (From existing non-BT portion)

Upgradation with widening

New Construction (From existing non-BT portion)

11. Type of Pavement Proposed

Chainage Length (km)

Rigid #REF! #REF!

Flexible #REF! #REF!

12. a. Whether the Proposed Road has the desired Road Land Width (RLW ) to accommodate required carriageway/ roadway (Mark ✔ as appropriate) Yes ✔ No

If No, what measure has been taken in DPR chainage wise Chainage Measures taken

b Indicate the widths of the following for the proposed road Proposed Widths (m)

In the Built Up Area In the Open Area

i) Carriageway 3.75 3.75

ii) Roadway 7.5 7.5

iii) Road Land Width 9 9

13. INDEX MAP (not to scale ) : To be attached saperately Enroute Habitations Name / Chainage H- Habitation

ROAD F-Facilities name

CD 1 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD

14. Traffic Data

Month & Year of Traffic Volume Count =

Days Motorised Traffic Non Motorised Traffic

Cars, Jeep, Vans, Three Wheelers Motorised two Wheelers Light Commercial Vehicle Trucks Agricultural Tractors Trallers Buses Cycles Cycle Rickshawa Animal Drawn Vechicle

Loaded Unloaded Over loaded Loaded Unloaded Over loaded Loaded Unloaded Over loaded SWC Num. Tyred

3 days traffic count is required in case design is done using IRC SP:72-2015 and 7 day count required in case design is done with IRC 37:2018

a Traffic Details in case design is done as per SP IRC 72:2015

ADT in the year of Traffic Count = 357

Growth rate adopted (%) = 6% Base Year Traffic AADT (T) = 318

Design Life (Years) = 10

Number of Harvesting Seasons = 1

No. of Days in Each Harvesting Season (t) = 75 Cumulative ESAL = 180678

Value of (n) assumed = 255 Traffic Category = #REF!

b Traffic Details in case design is done as per IRC 37-2018

A= Intitial traffic in the year of completion of construction in terms of the number of commericial vehicles per day

D= Lane distribution factor

F= Vehicle damage factor

n= Design life in years

r= growth rate adopted %

N= The cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for the design in terms of msa

Projected Commercial Vehicle Per Day

c Projected Passenger Car Unit (PCU/day)

15. Design Subgrade CBR ( for Different Sections atleast one Test/km ) =

Liquid Limit (LL)

Plastic Limit (PL)

Plasticity Index (PI)

16. Relavant Method & Codes used for Pavement Design

a Method Used for Designing of Pavement ((Mark ✔ as appropriate) Conventional New Technology

b If New Technology is used, indicate the name (Please indicate New Technology used in Subgrade, Sub-Base, Base, Surface Course layer separately)

c Code used for designing Flexible pavement (Mark ✔ as appropriate) IRC:SP:72-2015 IRC:37-2018

d Code used for designing Rigid Pavement (Mark ✔ as appropriate) IRC:SP:62-2014 IRC:58-2011

e Any other Codes used for New Technology/ Other, please indicate

17. Existing and Proposed Pavement Cross Section drawing & details both for flexible and rigid (Separately Chainage-wise)

i) Cross Section of the Existing road showing different component layers. Cross Section of the Proposed road showing different component layers.

Chainage #REF! Chainage #REF!

(Drawing should be as per Existing Pavement) Pavement Layer Thickness (mm) (Drawing should be as per actual provisions made in DPR) Pavement Layer Thickness (mm)

ii) Cross Section of the Existing road showing different component layers. Cross Section of the Proposed road showing different component layers.

Chainage #REF! Chainage #REF!

(Drawing should be as per Existing Pavement) Pavement Layer Thickness (mm) (Drawing should be as per actual provisions made in DPR) Pavement Layer Thickness (mm)

iii) Cross Section of the Existing road showing different component layers. Cross Section of the Proposed road showing different component layers.

Chainage #REF! Chainage #REF!

(Drawing should be as per Existing Pavement) Pavement Layer Thickness (mm) (Drawing should be as per actual provisions made in DPR) Pavement Layer Thickness (mm)

iv) Cross Section of the Existing road showing different component layers. Cross Section of the Proposed road showing different component layers.

Chainage From To

(Drawing should be as per Existing Pavement) Pavement Layer Thickness (mm) (Drawing should be as per actual provisions made in DPR) Pavement Layer Thickness (mm)

v) Cross Section of the Existing road showing different component layers. Cross Section of the Proposed road showing different component layers.

Chainage From To

(Drawing should be as per Existing Pavement) Pavement Layer Thickness (mm) (Drawing should be as per actual provisions made in DPR) Pavement Layer Thickness (mm)

Separate cross section drawings along with tabular details of the pavement layers should be repeated (chainage wise) for each type of cross section encountered.

18. Sources and the Lead distances of Materials are as under (Lead to be measured from the mid-point of the proposed road)

Sl. No. Material Source Lead Distance (km) Sl. No. Material Source Lead Distance (km)

1 Earth for embankment construction Local 1-2km 6 M-Sand Raipur 80-90km

2 Murrum/ Carted soil (Subgrade) Local 5-10km 7 Cement Raipur 80-90km

3 Murrum/ Gravel for shoulder (Subgrade) Local 5-10km 8 Emulsion Raipur 80-90km

4 Aggregate Local 80-90km 9 Bitumen Raipur 80-90km

5 Sand Local 10-15km 10 Steel Raipur 80-90km

19. Cost Details of proposal (Please fill all the entries or write "NA" wherever applicable )

a Pavement Components

Description of layer Quantity Unit Rate in Rs. Amount in Rs. GST in Rs. Amount (I/C GST) in Lakhs Average cost/ km in Lakhs

Flexible pavement

Preparatory & Earthwork

i Clearing & scarifying #REF! Sqm #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

ii Earth Work - in Excavation/ Cutting #REF! Cum #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

iii Earthwork- in Filling (Embankment) #REF! Cum #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

iv Subgrade (if provided seperately)

a. Subgrade (Using local Soil) Cum

b. Subgrade (Carted Soil) Cum

c. Treated Subgrade (Stabilized Subgrade) Cum

a. Earthen Shoulder #REF! Cum #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

b. Gravel Shoulder Cum

c. GSB Quality Shoulder Cum

Sub-Base Course

vi Granular Sub base #REF! Cum #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

vii Soil + Aggregate Mix Cum

viii Stabilised sub base Cum

ix WBM Gr -II Cum

x WBM Gr -III Cum

xi WMM #REF! Cum #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

xii Stabilised base Cum

Bituminous Course

xiii Prime Coat #REF! Sqm #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

xiv Tack Coat #REF! Sqm #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

xv Binder Course (BM/ DBM ) Indicate Type Cum

xvi Surface Course (MSS/OGPC/ SDBC/ BC) OGPC #REF! Sqm/ Cum #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

xvii Seal Coat #REF! Sqm #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

xviii Surface Course with Surface Dressing

a. Single Coat Surface Dressing Sqm

b. Double Coat Surface Dressing (with or without Pre-Coating indicate) Indicate Type Sqm

Item in the BOQ which is not incorporated in the recent vetted SoR

Total cost of Flexible pavement (a) #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Cement Concrete Road

xix GSB #REF! Cum #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

xx WBM/ WMM #REF! Cum #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

xxi Concrete for Pavement (M30) on existing CC Pavement #REF! Cum #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

xxii Concrete for Pavement (M30) for newly proposed CC Pavement portion #REF! Cum #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

xxiv Cell Filled Concrete Pavement Cum

xxv Panelled Cement Concrete Pavement #REF! Cum #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Item in the BOQ which is not incorporated in the recent vetted SoR

Total cost of Concrete Pavement (b) #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Total cost of Pavement (a + b) #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Cost deduction due to higher specification in pavement design** 0 0.00 0.00 #REF!

Final Pavement Cost after deduction #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Note : ** The details of Higher Specification considered in pavement design over & above admissible guidelines need to be provided under 19 (g) and detailed calculation of the same to be attached with the DPR separately.

b Cross Drainage (CD) Works

i Existing CD (requiring repair)

Type of CD Location/ Chainage Number Total Length of CDs Amount in Lakhs

ii Existing CD (requiring replacement)

Type of Existing CD Type of Proposed CD Location/ Chainage Number Total Length of CDs Amount in Lakhs

iii New proposed CD

Type of CD Location/ Chainage Number Total Length of CDs Amount in Lakhs

3.0 m SPAN SLAB CULVERT ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,m 0.00 0.00 #REF!

6.0 m 2SPAN SLAB CULVERT ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,m 0.00 0.00 #REF!

Note: Similar type of CDs may be grouped together for each category

Amount in Rs. GST in Rs. Amount (I/C GST) in Lakhs Average cost/ km in Lakhs

Total Cost of CD works #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

c Protection works Chainage (Expand as applicable)

From To Length( m) Amount in Lakhs Average cost/ m in Lakhs

Retaining wall I Side #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Both Side #REF! #REF!

Breast wall I Side #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Both Side #REF! #REF!

Toe wall & Pitching I Side #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Both Side #REF! #REF!

Pitching / turfing for slopes i

Amount in Rs. GST in Rs. Amount (I/C GST) in Lakhs Average cost/ km in Lakhs

Total cost of Protection works #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

d Side Drains (if Provided) Chainage (Expand as applicable)

From To Length( m) Amount in Lakhs Average cost / m in Lakhs

Pucca Drain (U/ V/ Trapezoidal/ etc) U I Side #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Both Side #REF! #REF!

Earthen/ Kacha Drain I Side #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Both Side #REF! #REF!

Amount in Rs. GST in Rs. Amount (I/C GST) in Lakhs Average cost/ km in Lakhs

Total cost of Side Drains works #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

e Road Logo, other Road Furniture including Road safety signs (Expand as applicable)

Sl. No. Type of Road Furniture Chainage Number Amount in Rs. GST in Rs. Amount (I/C GST) in Lakhs Average cost/ km in Lakhs

i Retro-Refl ective Traffi c signs #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

ii PMGSY 'Logo' board #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

iii PMGSY informatory Sign Board #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

iv Citizen Information Board #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Total cost of Road Furniture #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

f Any other Provisions

Sl. No. Items (Please Specify) Amount in Rs. GST in Rs. Amount (I/C GST) in Lakhs Average cost/ km in Lakhs

i Kilometre Stones & Boundary Pillar, Guard Stone #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

ii Cement Concrete Pipe NP3,Earthen/ Kacha Drain, Road marking,Speed Braker #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

iii Consultancy charges ,Stone Inauguration #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Total cost of Other Provisions #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

g Other Items under Higher Specifications (Additional Cost to be borne by the State, apart from those under 19(a) to 19(f))

Sl. No. Items Amount in Rs. GST in Rs. Amount (I/C GST) in Lakhs Average cost/ km in Lakhs

i Land Acquisition

ii Shifting of Utilities #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

iv Any other (Please specify)

Total cost of Higher Specification #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

h Total Construction Cost - Sum of 19 (a) to 19 (g) Amount in Rs. GST in Rs. Amount (I/C GST) in Lakhs Average cost/ km in Lakhs

Total Construction Cost of the Project #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! C'!K36

20. Five Year Routine Maintenance

To be estimated as per provision of Operation Manual Year Cost (I/C GST) in Lakhs % of Total construction cost Cost /km in Lakhs

I #REF! #REF! #REF!

II #REF! #REF! #REF!

III #REF! #REF! #REF!

IV #REF! #REF! #REF!

V #REF! #REF! #REF!

Renewal coat after 5 years #REF! #REF! #REF!

Total Maintenance Cost #REF! #REF!

Maintenance after 6th years renewal coat I #REF! #REF! #REF!

II #REF! #REF! #REF!

III #REF! #REF! #REF!

IV #REF! #REF! #REF!

V #REF! #REF! #REF!

Total Maintenance Cost #REF! #REF!

Grand Total of maintenance #REF! #REF!

21.Does the Estimation Conform to Standard Rate Analysis and SSR generated for the current Phase (Mark ✔ as appropriate) Vetted at NRIDA Year of SoR

22. Final Project Cost Abstract :

Cost sharing pattern between MoRD and State (Mark ✔ as appropriate) General Area (60:40) ✔ Special Area (90:10)

Item as per Entry 19 above Total Cost in Lakhs GST in Lakhs Total Cost (I/C GST) in Lakhs MoRD Share in Lakhs State Share in Lakhs Average Cost/ km (I/C GST) in Lakhs

19(a) Pavement #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

19(b) CD Structures #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

19(c) Protection Works #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

19(d) Drains #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

19(e) Road Furniture #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

19(f) Other Provisions #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

19(g) Higher Specifications #REF! #REF! #REF! Not Applicable #REF! #REF!

Total Project Construction Cost (Excluding Maintenance Cost) #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Note : In calculating MoRD and State Share for items 19 (a) to 19 (f) above, a proper calculation sheet should be attached if specifications/ provisions higher than those prescribed in the guidelines have been taken in the estimate e.g. extra width of road or crust thickness or provisions of bituminous layer over & above that allowed in the guidelines. In such cases, the extra cost should be fully booked under State Share. All such extra amount, over and above the sharing pattern between Centre and the State, so booked in the state share for items 19(a) to 19(f) above, plus the amount under 19(g) will become the total amount of higher specification.

Certified that the source of materials & lead distance is shortest, and other information provided above is correct

Prepared By (Signature) Checked By at PIU/ Circle office (Signature) Technical Scrutiny at STA by: (Signature)

Designation Designation Designation

Counter Signatures of Co-ordinator STA :

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA Annexure 7.3

Format for Consolidated Report of the STA ( See Para 7.4 )

On the Project Proposals Under PMGSYY

1 . State :- Chhattisgarh Phase :- Year :- 2023-2024

2 . Name of the member of the STA involved in the Technical Scrutiny.

3 . Weather Pre - DPR meeting was held wih SRRDA and DPIUs.

4 . Summary of Project Proposals Scrutinized indicating district wise and road wise details of length and Cost. The summary includes the No. of Package and total value.

5 . Weather Schedule for Scrutiny was fixed in advance (give details) and difficulty in adhering to schedule.

6 . Actual scrutiny process and time taken for scrutiny (Please indicate the dates).

7 . Interaction of of the Engineer of the Executive Agencies with the STA

8 . Major deficiencies observed during scrutiny with details

9 . Reliabilty of data obtained through investigation and used in the design / Estimation.

10 . Compliance of the provision / instruction given in the guideline / circular /operations manuals / IRC codes etc. in the preparation of DPRs including Environmental / RR / Road safety aspecta etc.

11 . Levels of response freom the Senior Engineer of the Executive Agencies for the suggestion give by the STAs for revision / modification in the DPRs.

12 . If DPRs outsourced, perceived level of competence of outsourced consultants and suggestion.

13 . Overall comments and impression of the STAs, if any, on the process of the preparation of DPRs and their technical scrutiny.

Name of the Coodinator STA

Proforma C (2021)- Part-2

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA

CHECKLIST FOR PIU (To be filled handwritten by PIU Head)

Sl No Items To be filled by PIU (Yes/No) Reference wherever applicable (Page no. in the DPR)

1 Whether the Certificate of Census 2011 attached with DPR ?

2 Whether the transect walk photographs, Minutes of Transect walk, Grama Sabha approval attached with the DPR?

3 Whether the benefited habitations and facility report generated from OMMAS attached with the DPR ?

4 Whether the Preliminary DPR Report generated from Gati Shakti attached with the Final DPR ?

5 Whether the proposal uploaded on GeoSadak and Gati Shakti and screenshot of the proposed alignment is attached with the DPR ?

6 Whether clear coloured & geotagged photographs at 100m interval depicting road pavement condition are attached ?

7 Is the raising of the embankment required as per the site conditions?

8 Whether the rates taken in BOQ from recent vetted SoR , If Yes Please mention the date of vetted SOR from NRIDA ?

9 Whether the PIU has taken any item in the BOQ which is not incorporated in the recent vetted SoR

10 Whether required roadway land width of 9 m and 7.50 m for 5.50 m and 3.75 m carriageway width respectively available througout or as per codal provision depending upon terrain ?

a If no, whether chainage wise details of available land width is attached with the DPR?

b If no, whether land acquisition proposed for obtaining required land width?

11 Whether the road has Geometrics as per Rural Roads Manual (RRM) / Latest Circulars of NRIDA?

12 Whether the radius of the curves provided are adequate as per codal provisions for design speed on rural roads?

If not, whether precautions have been taken and included in the DPR?

13 Is Road Plan, L & X section and Junction design drawings attached ?

14 Is Traffic Signs and Road Marking Plan attached with DPR ?

15 Whether soil test report showing (a) Gradation (b) Plasticity limits (LL, PL & PI) (c) Standard Proctor Compaction (MDD & OMC) (d) CBR tests on existing subgrade soil is attached ?

16 Whether stabilisation of subgrade proposed in case subgrade CBR is less than 5% for pavement in widening portion or for new pavement construction?

17 If stabilisation of subgrade is proposed, whether the test report of stabilised subgrade for determining 'Optimum stabiliser content' and 'subgrade strength achieved after stabilisation' is attached ?

18 Whether any carted soil is proposed for improvement of sub grade/ shoulder?

If yes, whether test results of carted soil is attached with the DPR?

19 Whether the test results of GSB material is attached with the DPR?

20 Whether 3 days/ 7 days traffic survey details attached with the DPR?

21 Whether 3rd party Traffic verification using ATCC is carried out for more than 1 MSA traffic as per guidelines/ as per latest circular and reports attached with the DPR?

22 Whether Axle load Surveys carried out for more than 1 MSA traffic and reports attached with the DPR?

23 Is the carriageway width (single lane or intermediate lane) of the proposed road is as per PCU/day consideration? (Refer to IRC 64:1990)

24 Whether existing road pavement has been divided into different sections (chainage starting from and chainage up to) depending upon extent of distress for strengthening/ rehabilitation of the proposed road section-wise?

If not, whether detailed reasons indicated in the DPR ?

25 Is the Pavement design done as per latest version of IRC Code? IRC SP:72-2015 and IRC SP:62-2014 or IRC 37-2018 and IRC 58-2011

26 Whether earth obtained from cutting section has been proposed for using in filling section? (Cutting from High embankment, side drains, protection work, CD work, etc.)

If not, whether detailed reasons indicated in the DPR ?

27 Whether hard rock or ordinary rock classification and quantity of hard rock or ordinary rock cutting proposed are justified based on previous experiences and rock outcrops seen in that area?

If yes, whether due credit given to hard rock ?

28 Only for PMGSY (Stage -I) sanctioned road

Whether the km wise existing pavement crust details (pavement layer details and their thickness, year of construction) are properly filled in Part-1 of Proforma C ?

Whether the proper weightage is given for the existing crust thickness while designing overlay thickness?

Whether overlay thickness is as per Clause 2.2.3 of IRC SP: 72-2015 based on traffic category ?

29 Whether the Binder Course/ Surfacing Course has been proposed as per IRC SP:72 - 2015 or IRC 37-2018 ?

If not, whether detailed reasons indicated in the DPR ?

30 Is Location of CDs, drains and Protections marked in L and X section drawings?

31 Whether length of existing/ proposed CDs/ Bridges deducted from pavement quantity calculation?

32 Whether the clear coloured photographs at the location of existing and Proposed CD structures, and protection structures are attached ?

33 Whether hydraulic calculation for each CD structures attached?

34 Whether latest rainfall data used for the design ?

35 Is the provision of CD structures and design is as per site requirement and as per relevant IRC codes?

36 In case of CD structures which have been proposed for replacement, whether you have ensured that such CDs are beyond repair and hence they need to be replaced?

37 Is the provision of Protection work and design is as per site requirement and as per relevant IRC codes?

38 Whether drainage plan attached with the DPR?

39 Whether Road Safety Audit (RSA) report irrespective of length of road attached and uploaded on OMMAS ?

40 Is the provision of road safety furniture proposed as per RSA and site requirement?

41 Is the road safety furniture items (Retroreflective road signs, thermoplastic reflective paint for road markings, Advance warning signs, Traffic calming measures, Crash barriers, hazard markers and parapets on bridges, etc.) proposed in DPR marked in the road plan

42 Is the use of local materials proposed as per IRC accreditation?

43 Whether any New technology has been proposed ?

a If yes, whether the site jointly inspected by PIU, DPR consultant (technology provider) and STA regarding selection of technology ? If yes, date on which site inspection was made. Date:

b If proposed, whether the requisite test results and other data is attached with the DPR ?

c Whether the comparative statement using conventional method and new technology is attached with the DPR ?

44 Whether the details of Higher Specification considered over & above admissible guidelines added under 19 (g) of Proforma C (Part-1) and detailed calculation of the same attached with the DPR ?

Whether the cost considered under 19 (g) of Proforma C (Part-1) uploaded under "Higher Specification" cost on OMMAS?

46 Whether Format F-9A and F-9B duly signed by Head of PIU are attached with the DPR ?

47 Whether the head of PIU inspected the site? If yes, date on which site inspection was made Date:

48 If yes, are you satisfied with the provisions made in the DPR as per site requirement and duly following guidelines/ IRC Codes ?

Total cost of construction after scrutiny by PIU/Circle-Office and before scrutiny at STA (I/C of GST) in Lakhs

Total Average cost/ km ( in Lakhs)

a Average Pavement cost/ km ( in Lakhs)

b Average CD Structures cost/ km ( in Lakhs)

c Average Other cost/ km ( in Lakhs)

Describe how the proposal meets PMGSY-IV objectives (Maximum 100 words)

Signature of PIU Head

Note: Part-2 of Proforma C to be filled personally by concerned PIU Head

Proforma C (2021)- Part-3

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA (PM-JUGA)

CHECKLIST FOR STA (To be filled handwritten by STA)

Sl No Items To be filled by STA (Yes/No) Reference wherever applicable (Page no. in the DPR)

1 Whether the Certificate of Census 2011 attached with DPR ?

2 Is the Part -I and Part-2 of Proforma C completely filled with signature? (Scrutiny by STA should only be done after it is completely filled and duly signed by the PIU officials)

If "Yes"- are you satisfied with overall entries made by PIU?

3 Whether clear coloured & geotagged photographs at 100m interval depicting road pavement condition are attached ?

4 Have you satisfied yourself that the proposed road is part of Candidate roads and approved CNCPL? (Approved CNCPL to be attached in DPR)

5 Whether the benefited habitations facility report generated from OMMAS attached with the DPR ?

Whether the Preliminary DPR Report generated from Gati Shakti attached with the Final DPR ?

6 Whether the screenshot of the proposed alignment is attached with the DPR and have you verified the alignment from the GeoSadak and Gati Shakti ?

If yes, are you satisfied with the proposed alignment as Through Route/ Major Rural Link providing access to facilities viz. Education/ Hospitals/ Markets etc. to rural population as per the objectives of PMGSY-IV?

7 Have you verified the Format F-9A and F-9B duly signed by Head of PIU are attached with the DPR ?

8 Is the raising of the embankment required as per the site conditions?

9 Is any discrepancies/ abnormalities found in the soil test reports attached with the DPR? (if yes, STA can re-verify again from the STA laboratory). Are all the four requisite test results on subgrade soil (Gradation, plasticity limits, compaction and CBR) reported in DPR?

10 Whether stabilisation of subgrade proposed in case subgrade CBR is less than 5% for pavement widening portion or for new pavement construction?

11 Are you satisfied with the type of stabilization proposed and its test results attached with the DPR ?

12 If stabilization is not proposed for the subgrade CBR less than 5, are you satisfied with the reasons provided by the PIU ?

13 Whether 3 days/ 7 days traffic survey details attached with the DPR ?

14 Have you analysed the ATCC report and Axle load test data and yourself satisfied with the design traffic recommended for the projected traffic more than 1 MSA as per guidelines/ as per latest circular?

15 Whether proposed road pavement has been divided into different sections (chainage starting from and chainage up to)?

If not, are you satisfied detailed reasons indicated in the DPR?

16 Only for PMGSY (Stage -I) sanctioned road

Whether the km wise existing crust details (layer thickness) properly entered in Part-1 of Proforma C?

Whether the proper weightage is given for the existing crust thickness during overlay design?

Whether overlay thickness is as per Clause 2.2.3 of IRC SP: 72-2015 based on traffic category?

17 If bituminous macadam usage is proposed, whether the design traffic is of T9 category as per IRC SP:72 - 2015.

18 Is hard shoulder proposed is as per IRC SP:72:2015 ?

19 Whether the road has Geometrics as per Rural Roads Manual (RRM) / Latest Circulars of NRIDA?

20 Whether the radius of the curves provided are adequate for design speed on rural roads?

If not, are you satisfied with the precautions taken and included in the DPR?

21 Is L and X section drawings, Junction design drawings attached ?

22 Is location of CDs, drains and Protections marked in L and X section drawings ?

23 Is Traffic Signs and Road Marking Plan attached with DPR ?

24 Are you satisfied with the location and type of CDs proposed as per photographs and Hydraulic calculations ?

25 Are you satisfied with the location and type of Protection work proposed as per photographs and site requirement?

26 Whether Road Safety Audit Report irrespective of length of roadattached and uploaded on OMMAS ?

27 Whether the road safety provisions in the DPR are as per RSA report?

28 Have you verified and satisfied yourself regarding the provisions in the DPR such as junction improvements, requirement of major CDs structures, pucca drains in habitation area, etc. from the satellite imagery of the proposal in GeoSadak and Gati Shakti ?

29 Whether any New technology has been proposed ?

a If yes, whether the site jointly inspected by PIU, DPR consultant (technology provider) and STA regarding selection of new technology ?

b If proposed, whether the requisite test results and other data is attached with the DPR ?

c Whether the requisite pavement design based on Mix design/ test results attached in the DPR?

d Whether the comparative statement using conventional method and new technology is attached with the DPR ?

30 Whether the details of Higher Specification considered over & above admissible guidelines added under 19 (g) of Proforma C (Part-1) and detailed calculation of the same attached with the DPR ?

31 Whether the cost considered under 19 (g) of Proforma C (Part-1) uploaded under "Higher Specification" cost on OMMAS?

32 Are you satisfied with the provisions made in the DPR as per site requirements and duly following guidelines/ IRC Codes ?

33 Is the Part-1 of Proforma C- "Final Proposal Details" properly/ completely filled with signatures after scrutiny at STA?

Total cost of construction after scrutiny by STA (Should match with Total Cost at Part-1 (I/C of GST)) in Lakhs

Total Average cost/ km ( in Lakhs)

a Average Pavement cost/ km ( in Lakhs)

b Average CD Structures cost/ km ( in Lakhs)

c Average Other cost/ km ( in Lakhs)

Specific Remarks, if any, by STA

Signature of STA Member Signature of STA Coordinator

Designation Designation

Note: Part-3 of Proforma C to be filled personally by concerned STA member responsible for scrutiny of DPR

Is the Part-1and Part-II of Proforma C- "Final Proposal Details" corrected based on the observations of STA?

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA FORMAT F-1

#REF! SUMMARY SHEET

Name of the Block TOTAL No. OF HABITATIONS Unconnected Habitation / VILLAGES

#REF! DISTRICT #REF!

Type of Proposal No. of Road Total length of road (KM.) No. of New CD Structures Estimated Cost (Rs. in LAKHS)

Pavement from format F-2A CD Structure from format F-2B Other TOTAL [(5) + (6)] +(7)] Main!A1

New Proposal 1.00 #REF! 7 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

TOTAL 1.00 #REF! 7 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! GA!A1

Cost of Pavement Per KM = #REF! Lacs

Cost of CD Per KM = #REF! Lacs

#REF! #REF! #REF!

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA FORMAT F-2A

ROADS PROPOSED IN PMGSY FOR RURAL CONNECTIVITY (PAVEMENT LAYERS)

DISTRICT: #REF! BLOCK: #REF! Package No. CG -

S.No. Name of road Road Length (KM.) DETAILS OF THICKNESS & COST FOR PAVEMENT ( RS. IN LACS)

Details Setting Out, Dismantling, C & G EARTH-WORK Subgrade preparation SUB-BASE (GSB) WBM G2 WBM G3 WMM SHOULDER CC DRAIN PRIME COAT & TACK COAT C.C. ROAD MISC. ITEMS INC ROAD FURNITURE TOTAL COST OF PAVEMENT [SUM OF (10) TO (22)]

BM/ DBM/BC Surface Course (MSS/Surface dressing/ SDBC/ OGPC)

1 #REF! #REF! Thickness - - - 150 MM - - 150 MM 170 MM - - - 20 MM 200 MM - -

Cost #REF! #REF! 0.00 #REF! 0.00 0.00 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0.00 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! GA!A1

Use A - Market, B - Educational Facility, C - Health & D - Combination of all.

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA Format F-2B

ROADS PROPOSED IN PMGSY FOR RURAL CONNECTIVITY (CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES)

DISTRICT: #REF! BLOCK #REF!

S.No. Name of Road Road length (Km.) EXISTING CD STRUCTURE BY TYPE DETAILS OF PROPOSED CD STRUCTURE BY TYPE TOTAL COST OF PROPOSED CD STRUCTURES

HUME PIPE CULVERT CULVERT (OTHER THAN HP) MINOR BRIDGE HUME PIPE CULVERT VENTED CAUSE WAY RCC/ BOX / SLAB CULVERT COST OF EACH TYPE PROPOSED CD STRUCTURE

No. Dia No. Length No. Length 1 ROW HP 1000 mm f 2 ROW HP 1000mm f 3 ROW VCW 1000mm f 15 Row VCW 1000 mm No Length 1.50 m Span Slab Cul 3.0 m Span Slab Cul 6.0 m Span Slab Cul Dismentling 6.0 m 2SPAN SLAB CULVERT

1 #REF! #REF! 18 HPC/Slab 0 32 _ _ Prop. Nos. 2 _ _ _ 5 51 4 0 1 6 0 CD!J8

Cost #REF! 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! Abs. CD'!G8

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA FORMAT F-4

DETAILS OF EXISTING ROADS(FOR UPGRADATION)

BLOCK: #REF! PACKAGE No.

Si.No. Name Of The Road Road Length (in) Km Road Connecting To Facilities accessed (Use A/B/C/D) Trafic per day Existing Road Detail

Total Motorised Total LCV \Truck \Bus\Agriculture\Tractor\Trailer Land Width (m) Road Width (m) Embankment WBM Layer Bituminous Layer

Height (m) Width(m) Width (m) Thickness(mm) Type Width (mm) Thickness(mm)

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA (PMGSY) FORMAT F-5

Association of Routes

Name of Road Package No Habitation Name Habitation served with Population

SC Population % of SC Population with respect to Total Population ST population % of ST Population with respect to Total Population Other than SC/ST Population Total Population

#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA

State: Disrict: Package No:

Material Source Lead (in Km)

Analysis Of Rates

SI. No; SI No. as per Mo RD SDB for Rural Roads Description Units Qty Rate (Rs) Amount(Rs)

A. Construction Activities

B. Maintainace Activities (Year wise)

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA FORMAT F-6

(Ministry of Rural Development, Govt. of India)

#REF! Block : #REF!

Length of the Road (Kms) : #REF! Distt : #REF!

ESTIMATE OF RETAINING WALL

S.No. SOR No. DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS Nos L(m) B(m) D(m) QUANTITY UNIT RATE (Rs.) AMOUNT (Rs.)

1 7.1 Excavation for Structure as per drawing and technical specifications Clause 305.1 including setting out, construction of shoring and bracing, removal of stumps and other deleterious material and disposal upto a lead of 50 m, dressing of sides and bottom and backfilling in trenches with excavated suitable material. (I) Ordinary Soil (i) Upto 3m. depth M!H47

#REF! 1 #REF! 1.60 1.60 #REF!

#REF! 2 #REF! 1.60 1.60 #REF!

#REF! Cum #REF! #REF!

2 7.10 Providing concrete for plain/reinforced concrete in open foundation complete as per drawings and technical specifications Clause 802, 803, 1202 & 1203 ii P.C.C grade M 15(Nominal mix (1:2.5:5)

#REF! 1 #REF! 1.60 0.20 #REF!

#REF! 2 #REF! 1.60 0.20 #REF!

#REF! Cum #REF! #REF!

3 7.18 Plain/reinforced cement concrete in substructure complete as per drawings and technical specification Clauses 802, 804, 805, 806, 807, 1202 ans 1204 II. P.C.C. grade M 20 (Nominal mix (1:2:4)

#REF! Cum #REF! #REF!

4 7.22 Providing weepholes in brick masonry/stone masonry, plain/ reinforced concrete abutment, wing wall, return wall with 100 mm dia AC pipe extending through the full width of the structures with slope of 1(V):20(H) towards drawing face complete as per drawing and technical specification Clauses 614, 709, 1204.3.7 #REF! - - - #REF! Nos #REF! #REF!

5 7.23 Backfilling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall complete as per drawings & technical specification Clause 1204.3.8

#REF! Cum #REF! #REF!

Design of Breast Wall

1 Geometry of Wall 0.40 O.K O.K

Vertical Height 1.00 m

Height upto Footing top 1.00

Slope Ht. 1.00 m

Top width of R/W 0.40 m

Front batter 1.00

Back batter 3.00 1.00 Batter Slope 1 in 3.00

Min depth of fill infront of R/Wall 1.40 m

Inner to inner width of retaing wall at bottom= 0.00 Weep hole of 100 mm at every 1 m

Bottom width of R/W 1.20 m hight from top to G.L. (minimum 1 row)

Zc/t of wall bottom 0.24 G.L.

2 Footing data 0.733

first offset 0.2 m

First offset height 0.2 m

Bottom width of footing 1.60 m 0.20 0.20

3 Soil data 1.20 2.8

Density of back fill = 1.7 t/m 3 0.20 0.9333333333

Angle of Repose 30 0.52 Rad 1.333333333

Angle of Friction 10.00 0.17 Rad 1.60

Angle of inclination of back 18.43 0.322 Rad

Active earth pressure coefficient for back fill= 0.476 :-Earth Pressure EP

Coefficent of friction 0.3

ka = cos2 ( ø- α )

4 Material properties cos2α x cos (α+ δ) ( 1+ sin ( ø+ δ )xsin ( ø+ i )

Grade of concrete( in t/m sq) 1500 t/m2 cos (α+ δ) cos (α+ i)) 2

Density of Conc 2.4 t/m3

Permissible compressive stress in concrete= 500.00 t/m2

Permissible tensile stress in concrete= -50.00 t/m2 φ = 30 deg 0.524 rad

δ = 10 deg 0.175 rad

5 Load Data α = 0.322 deg 0.006 rad

Live load surcharge = 0 i = 0.000 deg 0.000 rad

Dead load of track structure 6.75 Ka = 0.476

Dispersion Width 3

Surcharge Pressure 2.25

A Check for Stresses

Stabilizing forces Lever arm w.r.toe of wall Lever arm w.r.t outer footing step Moment w.r.toe of footing" Moment w.r.t outer footing step

TOTAL MOMENT DUE TO VER. LOADS AT EDGE OF FOOTING= 1.47 1.99

Destabilizing forces

due to back fill =

TOTAL MOMENT DUE TO HOR LOADS AT FOOTING TOP/BOTTOM= 0.30 0.52 tm/m

Stress at top of footing

Pmax = 7.06 t/m2 O.K

Pmin = -2.72 t/m2 O.K

B Check for Footing Adequacy

Calculation of forces Lever arm w.r.toe of footing Moment arm w.r.toe of footing

First footing 0.768 0.90 0.69

First footing 0.68 1.50 1.02

Total 1.448 1.71

Calculation of property

Area at BF 1.60 m2

Z at BF 0.43 m3

Bearing pressure

Total Stabilising moment 3.70 t-m

Total Destabilising moment 0.52 t-m

Net moment = 3.18

Total Horizontal force 0.51

Frictional force 1.21

Passive resistance of SOIL IN FRONT 5.20

Total Destablizing moment 0.52

Stablising Moment 3.70

Sub Engineer Assistant Engineer Executive Engineer

CGRRDA,PIU-02,Pathalgaon. CGRRDA,PIU-02,Pathalgaon. CGRRDA,PIU-02,Pathalgaon.

Dist-Jashpur. Dist-Jashpur. Dist-Jashpur.

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA

CERTIFICATE OF GROUND VERIFICATION FROM EXECUTIVE/ENGINEER / HEAD OF PIU

NAME OF ROAD : #REF!

LENGTH : #REF! KM.

1 a) Certified that the Land width for the Road is available and that no additional land is required, or

b) Certified that land width for the Road is likely to be available as certified by the panchayats

2 a) Certified that no forest land is involved along the entire road way, or

b) Certified that the case for permission under forest conservation Act has been moved to the forest Department on (Date) and file no.

3 Certified that the DPR has been checked at site.

Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY)

(Ministry of Rural Development, Govt. of India)

LIST OF DPR'S VERIFIED ON GROUND

Name of Road : #REF! Package No. : -

Sl.no. DPR's seen on ground by DPR Nos % of total number Remark

1 Executive Engineer

2 Assistant Engineer

#REF! #REF! #REF!

Community Consultation Checklist – Engineering

Question Yes No N/a

1. Has the PIU conducted a survey using the GSS app?

2. Has the feedback from the SC/ST population been taken into consideration during the survey conducted through the GSS app by the PIU?

3. Are there any flood prone areas on the road?

1.1 Are locations specified and inspected?

1.2. Is high flood level specified for each stretch?

1.3 Are locations specified and inspected?

4. Are there any locations on the road where irrigations ducts need to be provided?

2.1 Are locations specified and inspected?

5. Can the road be used as a shortcut by through traffic?

6. Does the road lead to any quarries, mining areas, brick kilns, logging areas, tourist attractions etc.?

7. Are there plans to build new schools, hospitals, temples etc

8. Is there potential for double connectivity?

If yes on any of 3-6:

6.1 Is information on location, size and nature of additional traffic generators and specific routes obtained?

9. Is there a need for deviations from existing track?

7.1 Were the proposals for deviation shown on site and explained to the community?

7.2 Is the land availability checked?

7.3 If there is a need for donation, were the owners consulted regarding their agreement to donate the land?

10. Is there a need for speed breakers?

8.1 Is location and rational for speed breakers identified?

8.2 Is rationale verified and checked on site?

8.3 Are alternative or additional locations discussed?

11. Are all existing intersections checked with the community on site?

9.1 Is the use of intersecting roads identified (e.g. school children, farm machinery, etc)?

12. Are proposed culvert locations verified with the community?

10.1 Is there a need for additional culverts?

10.2 If yes, are locations identified?

For DPR consultant For PIU For PIC

DETAILED ESTIMATE OF R.C.C. SLAB CULVERT OF 3 Mtr. SPAN

Sr. No. SOR item no Description of Items No. Measurements Unit Qty. Rate Amt.

Leng. Width Thick

1 7.1 Excavation for Structure as per drawing and technical specifications Clause 305.1 including setting out, construction of shoring and bracing, removal of stumps and other deleterious material and disposal upto a lead of 50 m, dressing of sides and bottom and backfilling in trenches with excavated suitable material. (I) Ordinary soil, i. Upto 3 m depth

Cum 230.008 #REF! #REF!

2 (II) Ordinary rock (not requiring blasting) i. Upto 3 m depth

Cum 32.970 #REF! #REF!

3 7.10 Providing concrete for plain/reinforced concrete in open foundation complete as per drawings and technical specifications Clause 802, 803, 1202 & 1203, (I).P.C.C. grade M 10, (i) Nominal mix (1:3:6)

Cut-off Wall 2x2 2.30 1.40 0.20 2.58

Cum 27.356 #REF! #REF!

4 7.18/ I Plain/reinforced cement concrete in substructure complete as per drawings and technical specification Clauses 802, 804, 805, 806, 807, 1202 ans 1204,For height upto 5 m, (I) P.C.C grade M 15 (Nominal mix (1:2.5:5)

Cum 262.938 #REF! #REF!

5 7.27/ II Providing and laying reinforced cement concrete in superstructure as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 800, 1205.4 and 1205.5, (II) R.C.C M 25 (Design mix)

Abutment Cap AND WITH BEEM 2 7.50 0.700 0.200 2.10

Cum 15.088 #REF! #REF!

6 7.31 Providing and laying cement concrete wearing course M 30 grade including reinforcement complete as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 800 and 1206.3 1 7.50 3.600 0.075 Cum 2.03 #REF! #REF!

7 7.28 Supplying, fitting, and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in superstructure complete as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 1002, 1010 and 1202

Type of Bar Nos. Dia of Bar (in mm) Spacing Length of Bar Wt . Per Unit length Total Wt.(MT)

Main Reinforcement (Bottom) 60 16 125 3827 1.578 0.362

Main Reinforcement (Top) 26 10 300 3008 0.617 0.048

Distribution (Bottom) 21 10 175 7420 0.617 0.096

Distribution (Top) 13 10 300 7420 0.617 0.060

Cap & Dirt Wall(Main Bars) 24 12 210 7420 0.888 0.158

Cap & Dirt Wall(Stirrups) 74 8 200 3060 0.395 0.089

Temprature Reinforcement, (Vertical Direction) 144 8 200 1800 0.395 0.102

Temprature Reinforcement, (Horizontal Direction) 16 8 200 16040 0.395 0.101

MT 1.099 #REF! #REF!

8 7.22 Providing weepholes in brick masonry/stone masonry, plain/ reinforced concrete abutment, wing wall, return wall with 100 mm dia AC pipe extending through the full width of the structures with slope of 1(V):20(H) towards drawing face complete as per drawing and technical specification Clauses 614, 709, 1204.3.7 35 NO 35.00 #REF! #REF!

9 7.23/ I Backfilling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall complete as per drawings & technical specification Clause 1204.3.8, (II) Granullar material 50% Quantity as per Item No. 7.1 115.004 #REF! #REF!

10 7.24 Providing and laying filter media with granular crushed aggregates as per specification to a thickness of not less than 600 mm with smaller size towards the soil and bigger size towards the wall and providing over the entire surface behind abutment, wing wall, return wall to the full height, compacted to firm condition complete as per drawing and technical specification Clause 1204.3.8

Behind Abutment 2 5.90 0.60 2.50 17.70

Behind Returns 4 3.95 0.60 2.50 23.70

Cum 41.400 #REF! #REF!

11 7.41/ III Providing and fixing in position 20 mm thick premoulded joint filler in expansion joint for fixed ends of simply supported spans, covered with sealant complete as per drawing and technical specifications 2 7.50 RM 15.00 #REF! #REF!

12 7.41/ IV Providing and fillling joint sealing compound as per drawings and technical specifications with coarse sand and 6 per cent bitumen by weight. 2 7.50 RM 15.00 #REF! #REF!

Say (Rs in Lacs ) : #REF!

0.1 FOUNDATION hard stata

2.3 0.1 3.6 WING WALL

HALF TOP & HALF BOTTOM PLAN

RETURN 0.20 3.0 M-20

0.1 1.4 0.30m Thick M15 N.B.L.

0.20 2.7 Base Concrete M-10 IRC SP-20-2002

DETAILED ESTIMATE OF R.C.C. SLAB CULVERT OF 2 SPAN 6M Mtr. SPAN

Sr. No. SOR item no Description of Items No. Measurements Unit Qty. Rate Amt.

Leng. Width Thick

1 7.1 Excavation for Structure as per drawing and technical specifications Clause 305.1 including setting out, construction of shoring and bracing, removal of stumps and other deleterious material and disposal upto a lead of 50 m, dressing of sides and bottom a

Cum 493.66 #REF! #REF!

(II) Ordinary rock (not requiring blasting) i. Upto 3 m depth

Cum 55.284 #REF! #REF!

7.7 Plain Cement Concrete M10 (1:3:6 nominal mix) in levelling course below open foundation of Head walls as per drawings & Technical Specification Clause 1109 (I)Nominal Mix 1:3:6(with 40mm Graded metal

Cut-off Wall 2x2 4.30 1.40 0.20 4.82

Cum 69.120 #REF! #REF!

2 7.10 Providing concrete for plain/reinforced concrete in open foundation complete as per drawings and technical specifications Clause 802, 803, 1202 & 1203, (I).P.C.C. grade M 10, (i) Nominal mix (1:3:6)

Cum 36.448 #REF! #REF!

3 7.10/ II Providing concrete for plain/reinforced concrete in open foundation complete as per drawings and technical specifications Clause 802, 803, 1202 & 1203 (II) P.C.C grade M 15 (Nominal mix (1:2.5:5)

Cut-off Wall 2x2 4.30 1.40 0.20 4.82

Cum 318.93 #REF! #REF!

7.9 Filling annular space around footing in rock as per technical specification Clause 1203.4.3.

P.C.C grade M 15 (Nominal mix 1:2.5:5)

Total Excavation in Rock Qty From Item 1 Above Cum 54.70

Deduction of Concrete Work on Rock Strata

Total Cum 26.84 #REF! #REF!

4 7.18/ I Plain/reinforced cement concrete in substructure complete as per drawings and technical specification Clauses 802, 804, 805, 806, 807, 1202 ans 1204,For height upto 5 m, (I) P.C.C grade M 15 (Nominal mix (1:2.5:5)

Cum 239.642 #REF! #REF!

5 7.27/ II Providing and laying reinforced cement concrete in superstructure as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 800, 1205.4 and 1205.5, (II) R.C.C M 25 (Design mix)

Abutment Cap 2 7.50 1.00 0.20 3.00

Cum 74.512 #REF! #REF!

6 7.31 Providing and laying cement concrete wearing course M 30 grade including reinforcement complete as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 800 and 1206.3 2 7.50 7.000 0.075 Cum 7.88 #REF! #REF!

7 7.28 Supplying, fitting, and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in superstructure complete as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 1002, 1010 and 1202

Type of Bar Nos. Dia of Bar (in mm) Spacing Length of Bar Wt . Per Unit length Total Wt.(MT)

Main Reinforcement (Bottom) 132 20 115 7298 2.466 2.376

Main Reinforcement (Top) 52 10 300 5340 0.617 0.171

Distribution (Bottom) 88 12 150 7420 0.888 0.580

Distribution (Top) 46 10 300 7420 0.617 0.211

Cap & Dirt Wall(Main Bars) 32 12 210 7420 0.888 0.211

Cap & Dirt Wall(Stirrups) 90 8 200 3420 0.395 0.122

Temprature Reinforcement, (Vertical Direction) 170 8 200 2400 0.395 0.161

Temprature Reinforcement, (Horizontal Direction) 24 8 200 19040 0.395 0.180

MT 4.43 #REF! #REF!

9 7.34 Providing and fixing in position pipe railing consisting of IS Rolled steel joist posts designation IS MB 100 (100x75) at 2.5 m interval and three rows of 50 mm dia steel pipes (light) including fixing in position on bridge deck complete as per drawing and technical specifications Clause 1208.2 2 25.40 Rm 50.80 #REF! #REF!

10 7.22 Providing weepholes in brick masonry/stone masonry, plain/ reinforced concrete abutment, wing wall, return wall with 100 mm dia AC pipe extending through the full width of the structures with slope of 1(V):20(H) towards drawing face complete as per drawin 78 NO 78.00 #REF! #REF!

11 7.23/ I Backfilling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall complete as per drawings & technical specification Clause 1204.3.8, (II) Sandy material 50% Quantity as per Item No. 7.1 244.989 #REF! #REF!

12 7.24 Providing and laying filter media with granular crushed aggregates as per specification to a thickness of not less than 600 mm with smaller size towards the soil and bigger size towards the wall and providing over the entire surface behind abutment, wing

Behind Abutment 2 5.60 0.60 3.68 24.73

Behind Returns 4 4.60 0.60 3.68 40.63

Cum 65.357 #REF! #REF!

13 7.41/ III Providing and fixing in position 20 mm thick premoulded joint filler in expansion joint for fixed ends of simply supported spans, covered with sealant complete as per drawing and technical specifications 4 7.50 RM 30.00 #REF! #REF!

14 7.41/ IV Providing and fillling joint sealing compound as per drawings and technical specifications with coarse sand and 6 per cent bitumen by weight. 4 7.50 RM 30.00 #REF! #REF!

Say (Rs in Lacs ) : #REF!

DESIGN AS PER IRC-SP-20-2002, PLATE NO 7.06, 7.07

7.5 FOUNDATION hard stata

HALF TOP & HALF BOTTOM PLAN

0.1 1.9 0.30m Thick M15 0.30m Thick M15 N.B.L.

0.20 3.7 1.4 Base Concrete M-10

Statement showng the details of Component wise cost of roads proposed under PM-JANMAN(PVTG) Statement showng the details of Component wise cost of roads proposed under PM-JANMAN(PVTG)

(Length in Km and Amount in Lakhs)

Sl. No. District Block Name of Road Pkg. No. Existing Surface Type Proposed Surface Type Proposed Pavement Details (Rs. In Lakhs) CDs (Rs. In Lakhs) Protection works (Road Part) (Rs. In Lakhs) Other Works Cost Total Project Cost (Rs in Lakhs) (24+27+30+34) Average Cost (Rs in Lakhs) / km (36/12) Carriage Width (in m) Roadway Width Traffic Category ESAL (MSA) 5% Accredited New Technology 10% Non Accredited New Technology Name of Benifit PVTG Habitations

Earthen Gravel CC BT CC BT Total (10+11) Earthwork including Shoulders GSB WBM G-II WBM G-III WMM Prime Coat Tack Coat BM/DBM OGPC /SDBC/BC Seal Coat CC Other Total Cost Average Cost/ km (24/12) No. Total Cost Avg Cost/No (27/26) Avg Cost/km (28/12) Total Cost Avg cost / km (30/12) Side Drain Road Furniture including Road safety signs Total Cost Avg cost / km (34/12) Existing Proposed Name of Technology Length of Technology Name of Technology Length of Technology

1 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 #REF! 0 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0.00 0.00 #REF! #REF! #REF! 0.00 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 7.00 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! - 3.75 7.50 T-4 Say 0.18 msa - - - - PMGSY-IV

Total #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0.00 0.00 #REF! #REF! #REF! 0.00 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 8.26 #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0.00 3.75 7.50 0.00 0.00

Note: 1. All costs including GST 2. Waste Plastic is a New Technology but will not be included in the 15% Accredited/Non Accredited new technology. #REF! C'!K37

PMGSY- IV, Batch-I, Year 2025-2026 BILL OF QUANTITY

PKG. No. :- CG 07- 134 Block:- Jashpur Distt. :- Jashpur

NAME Of Road :- L 870 Badabanai To Khuntitoli L 0877 BARGAON TO HARRAKONA L 875 JASHPUR COLLAGE ROAD TO GRANCHTOLI-LAXMI NAGAR L 874 Lokhandi To Basta Via Ghulmul L 879 SITONGA TO CHENGOTOLI TOTAL

Sr. No. SOR Item No. DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS RATE (Rs.) UNIT QUANTITY AMOUNT (Rs.) QUANTITY AMOUNT (Rs.) QUANTITY AMOUNT (Rs.) QUANTITY AMOUNT (Rs.) QUANTITY AMOUNT (Rs.) QUANTITY AMOUNT (Rs.)

1 2.1 Setting Out Setting Out work complete with construction of bench mark (Min 1 per km) working benchmark (Min 4 per km) and near all bridges and cross-drainage works made of bricks/stone masonary or concrete and reference pillars made of precast concrete poles/concrete filled 100 mm dia A.C.pipe @ 100 m interval of as required on both sides of the formation width, marking on centre line, setting out curves and recording of centre line levels and other required levels and distances etc. including setting out of crossdrainage structures & bridges with required reference pillars and marking etc. as directed by Engineer-in-Charge. 13949.00 Km 7.30 101828 2.9 40452 1.58 22039 4.6 64165 2.55 35570 18.93 264055

2 2.2 Clearing grass and removal of rubbish up to a distance of 30 m outside the periphery of the area as per Technical Specification Clause 201. 2.00 Sqm 26280 52560 10440 20880 5688 11376 16560 33120 9180 18360 68148.00 136296

3 2.3 Clearing and Grubbing Road Land Clearing and grubbing road land including uprooting wild vegetation, grass, bushes, shrubs, saplings and trees of girth upto 300 mm, removal of stumps of such trees cut earlier and disposal of unserviceable materials and stacking of serviceable material to be used or auctioned, upto a lead of 1000 m including removal and disposal of top organic soil not exceeding 150 mm in thickness as per Technical Specification Clause 201. (A) In area of non-thorny jungle 7.00 Sqm 29200 204400 11600 81200 6320 44240 18400 128800 10200 71400 75720.00 530040

4 2.11 Dismantling of Cement Concrete Pavements Dismantling of cement concrete pavements and breaking to pieces not exceeding 0.02 cum in volume and stock piling at designated locations and disposal of dismantled materials upto a lead of 1000 m, stacking serviceable and unserviceable materials separately, as per Technical Specification Clause. 202 2068.00 Sqm 0 124.5 257466 37.5 77550 168 347424 0 0 330.00 682440

5 3.2 Compacting Original Ground / Existing Embankment. Loosening, Levelling and Compacting original ground/existing embankment/supporting embankment to facilitate placement of first layer of embankment, scarified to a depth of 150 mm, mixed with water at OMC and then compacted by rolling so as to achieve minimum dry density as given in Tables 300.1 and 300.2 for embankment construction as per Technical Specification Clause 301.4.1. 25.00 Cum 6052.50 151313 2610 65250 1422 35550 4140 103500 2295 57375 16519.50 412988

6 3.8 (i) Construction of unlined surface drains of average cross-sectional area 0.40 sqm in soil to specified lines, grades, levels and dimensions. Excavated material to be used in embankment with all lift and lead of 50 m as per Technical Specification Clause 307. 99.00 Cum 11800.00 1168200 4400 435600 800 79200 5850 579150 3200 316800 26050.00 2578950

7 3.5 (i) Excavation in Cutting in Soil by manual/ Machinery means Excavation for roadway in soil for carrying of cut earth to embankment site with a lift upto 1.5 m and lead upto 50 m as per Technical Specification Clause 302.3 85.00 Cum. 2530.75 215114 1500 127500 592.8 50388 2540 215900 1820.5 154743 8984.05 763644

8 3.9 Excavation in ordinary rock including loading in a truck and carrying of excavated material to embankment site with all lift and lead upto 50 m as per Technical Specification Clause 302.3.5. 287.00 Cum. 0.00 0 0 0 250 71750 0 0 0 0 250.00 71750

9 3.3 (i) Construction of Embankment with Material Obtained from Roadway Cutting (i) Construction of embankment with approved materials deposited at site from roadway cutting and excavation from drain and foundation of other structures graded and compacted to meet requirement of Tables 300.1 and 300.2 as per Technical Specification Clause 301.5 63.00 Cum. 7542.6195 475185 3313.865 208773 1321.22 83237 5344.397 336697 3211.032 202295 20733.13 1306187

10 3.4 (ii) Construction of Embankment with Material Obtained from Pits Construction of embankment with approved material obtained from borrow pits, transporting to site, spreading, grading to required slope and compacting to meet requirement of Tables 300.1 and 300.2 (Beyond 250m)with all leads as per Technical Specification Clause 301.5(Having CBR more than 5) 222.00 Cum. 24657.8805 5474049 8936.635 1983933 5269.99 1169938 17606.303 3908599 9381.718 2082741 65852.53 14619261

11 3.12 (a) Construction of subgrade and earthen shoulders with approved material (Granular material having CBR not less than 7) obtained from borrow pits with all lifts and leads, transporting to site, spreading, grading to required slope and compacted to meet requirement of Table 300.2 as per Technical Specification Clause 303.1.For Item No.3.12(a) & (b) 192.00 Cum 4844.38815 930123 1910.4609 366808 1047.1617 201055 3047.629575 585145 1689.4248 324370 12539.07 2407501

12 3.12 (b) Construction of subgrade and earthen shoulders with approved material (Granular material having CBR not less than 10) obtained from borrow pits with all lifts and leads, transporting to site, spreading, grading to required slope and compacted to meet requirement of Table 300.2 as per Technical Specification Clause 303.1.(To be used for side shoulder WBM) 223.00 Cum 4790.39891 1068259 1678.59326 374326 917.06938 204506 3110.68875 693684 1619.60572 361172 12116.36 2701947

13 4.1 (d) Crushed stone materials (CBR 35 or more), This item is to be used only, where local GSB material or GSB material with blending with other material is not available. (a) Construction of granular sub-base by providing well graded material having CBR 20 or more, spreading in uniform layers with motor grader on prepared surface, mixing by mix in place method with rotavator at OMC, and compacting with vibratory rollers of 80 to 100KN static weight to achieve the desired density, complete as per Technical Specification Clause 401. For Grading mentioned in table 400.1 (Grading III) 1772.00 Cum. 4130.38 7319040 1735.4385 3075197 809.5995 1434610 2809.1835 4977873 1557.0765 2759140 11041.68 19565860

14 4.8 Wet Mix Macadam Providing, laying, spreading and compacting graded stone aggregate to wet mix macadam specification including premixing the material with water at OMC in mechanical mixer (Pug Mill), carriage of mixed material by tipper to site, laying in uniform layers in sub-base/base course on a well prepared sub-base and compacting with smooth wheel roller of 80 to 100kN weight to achieve the desired density including lighting, barricading and maintenance of diversion, etc as per Tables 400.11 & 400.12 and Technical Specification Clause 406. 1887.00 Cum. 3830.04 7227277 1533.1605 2893074 715.1355 1349461 2581.9335 4872109 1456.5105 2748435 10116.78 19090355

15 5.1 Prime Coat Providing and applying primer coat with bitumen emulsion (SS-1) on prepared surface of granular base including cleaning of road surface and spraying primer at the rate of 0.70-1.0 kg/sqm using mechanical means as per Technical Specification Clause 502 62.00 Sqm. 25723.32 1594846 9489.57 588353 4929.57 305633 17212.89 1067199 9485.82 588121 66841.17 4144153

16 5.2 (iii) Tack Coat (iii) Providing and applying tack coat with Bitumen emulsion (RS-1) using emulsion distributor at the rate of 0.25 to 0.30 kg per sqm on the prepared granular surfaces treated with primer & cleaned with Hydraulic broom as per Technical Specification Clause 503. 21.00 Sqm. 25723.32 540190 9489.57 199281 4929.57 103521 17281.64 362914 9485.82 199202 66909.92 1405108

17 5.13 20mm thick Open-Graded Premix Carpet using Bituminous Binder Mixing with processed Waste plastic (as per IRC:SP:98-2013) by replacement of 8% Bitumen binder by weight. Providing, laying and rolling of 20mm thick open-graded premix carpet (Thickness not less than 20 mm at any place) composed of 13.2 mm graded aggregate size @ 0.18 cum per 10 sqm & 11.2 mm graded aggregate size @ 0.09 cum per 10 sqm using with bitumenous binder @13.43Kg per 10 sqm (i.e. 92% of standard Bitumen and 8% waste processed plastic by weight shall be used for coating aggregate after its heating) as per IRC:SP:98-2013, laying to required line, grade and level to serve as wearing course on a previously prepared base, including mixing in a suitable plant, laying and rolling with a three wheel 80-100 kN static roller capacity, finished to required level and grades as per Technical Specification Clause 508 to be followed by seal coat of either Type A , Type B or Type C as per Technical Specification. 170.00 Sqm. 25723.32 4372964 9489.57 1613227 4929.57 838027 17281.64 2937879 9485.82 1612589 66909.92 11374686

18 5.5 Case II (B) Seal Coat Providing and laying seal coat sealing the voids in a bituminous surface laid to the specified levels, grade and cross fall using Type A, Type B and Type C as per Technical Specification Clause 510, Viscocity grade (VG) Bitumen specification as per IS 73:2006 Case - II : Type B (II)Bitumen (VG-30) 60.00 Sqm. 25723.32 1543399 9489.57 569374 4929.57 295774 17281.64 1036898 9485.82 569149 66909.92 4014595

19 7.10 Providing concrete for plain/reinforced concrete in open foundation complete as per drawings and technical specifications Clause 802,803, 1202 & 1203 4576.00 Cum. 1614.34 7387221 403.125 1844700 619.0994292 2832999 213.113 975205 243.293 1113309 3092.97 14153434

20 6.8 Construction of Panel concrete Construction of Panel concrete, plain cement concrete pavement, thickness as per design, over a prepared sub base, with 43 grade cement or any other type as per Clause 1501.2.2 M30 (Grade) coarse and fine aggregates conforming to IS:383, maximum size of coarse aggregate not exceeding 25 mm, mixed a in a concrete mixer of not less than 0.2 cum capacity and appropriate weigh batcher using approved mix design, laid in approved fixed side formwork (steel channel, laying and fixing of 125 micron thick polythene film, wedges, steel plates including leveling the formwork as per drawing), spreading the concrete with shovels, rakes, compacted using needle, screed and plate vibratos and finished in continuous operation including provision of contraction and expansion, construction joints, applying debonding strips, primer, sealant, admixture as approved, curing of concrete slabs for 14 days. Curing compound (where specified) and water finishing to lines and grade as per drawing and technical specification Clause 1501. PCC Grade M-30 Each Panel (0.5 m x0.5m to 1.00m x 1.00m) thickness 100 mm. 6048.00 Cum. 215.63 1304100 150 907200 112.5 680400 0 0 0 0 478.13 2891700

21 9.21 (B) Retro-Reflective Traffic signs Direction and place identification signs up to 0.9 Sqm. sisn board Providing and erecting direction and place identification of Retro reflective sheeting classs A/ class B sign boards type IV as per IRC-67 made of 2 mm thick M.S. Sheet duly stove enameled paint white colour in front and grey colour on back with reflective border of 70 mm width and required message, letters, figures with reflective tape of engineering grade as per MORI) specifications ofrequired shade and colour. Supported and welded on two nos.47 mm x 47 mm of 12 SWG square tube of 3050 mm height duty strengthened by 25 mm x 5 mm MS flat iron on edges on back firmly fixed to the ground by means of properly designed foundations with M-15 grade cement concrete 450 mm x 450 mm x 600 mmr 600 mm below ground level as per approved drawing and Technical Specification Clause 1701 6244.00 Sqm. 66.00 412104 14.4 89914 7.2 44957 40.8 254755 21 131124 149.40 932854

22 9.16 Providing & Fixing of PMGSY 'Logo' board Providing and fixing of typical PMGSY logo board as per MoRD specifications and drawings. 6626.00 Each 5.00 33130 2 13252 2 13252 3 19878 2 13252 14.00 92764

23 9.21 (A) A typical design of PMGSY informatory Sign Board is shown in fig. 1700.1 The specification and installation details ofthe typical sign board are given below: (i)The board will be a composite unit consisting of three plates of Alumininm Composite Materials (ACM), material specifications are per Clause 1701.3.7 The top most plate will be in diamond shape of 600 mn x 600 mm size, riveted over welded M.S. angle iron frame of 25 mm x 25 mm x 5 mm size on back on edges. The middle plate will be 1200 mm 150 mm size riveted over welded rvr.s. angle iron frame of 25 mm x 25 nm x 5 mm size on back on edges. The main Iower most plate wiII be 1500 mn x 600 mm size, riveted over welded M.S. angle iron frame of 25 mm x 25 mm x 5 mm size welding of all the sheets over angle iron frame will be done neatly to have plain surface on one side. The angle iron frames of the lower most plate and the middle plate will be welded to two nos. 75 mm x 75 mm (12 SWG ) sheet tubes posts placed at 1125 mm apart centre to centre. The top of the middle plate wilt be flushed with the top of 75 nm dia medium steel tube posts and these posts will be embedded in cement concrete M 15 grade blocks of 450 mm x 450 mm x 600 mm below ground level. The height of bottom of the lower nost plate will be 1200 mm from normal ground level and the bottom of middle plate will be 100 mm above the top level of the lower most plate. The diamond shaped plate mounted over angle iron frame will be connected to middle plate by square medium steel section of 47 mm x 47 mm thickness 12 SWG having a spacing of 100 mm between the diamond shaped plate and middle plate and this square section will be welded to the bottom point of the diamond shaped plate. (ii) The lettering and borders etc. of middle and bottom plate, pMGSy logo on top plates shall be as per clause 1701.4.6 messages/Borders. All the section of frame and posts will be painted with primer and two coats of Epoxy paint The steel tube below ground level will be painted with three coats of Epoxy paint The design, painting and lettering shall be done as per approved drawing. (iii) For warranty and durability the clause 1701.5 and for maintenance the clause 1911 shall be applicable. (iv) A reference number along with the month and year of installation should be placed on the back of a sing in a contrasting colour or by stamping in characters not exceeding 50 mm in height. 17699.00 Each 2.00 35398 2 35398 1 17699 2 35398 2 35398 9.00 159291

24 9.15 (A) Providing and fixing 'Citizen Information Board' of PMGSY Project (A) Providing and fixing of typical " PMGSY Citizen Information Board" with Logo as per MoRD specifications & drawings, made of 75 mm square or 75 mm dia circular steel tube of 12 SWG 3.2 m height and cross member 2 nos 1m long, fixed with angle iron 50x50x5 mm MS angle on the back 14010.00 Each 2.00 28020 2 28020 2 28020 2 28020 2 28020 10.00 140100

25 9.8 (i) Kilometer Stone Reinforced cement concrete M15 grade kilometer stone/local stone of standard design as per IRC:8 fixing in position including painting and printing, etc as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 1703 (I) 5th Kilometer Stone (precast) 3947.00 Each 1.00 3947 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 3947

26 9.8 (ii) Kilometer Stone Reinforced cement concrete M15 grade kilometer stone/local stone of standard design as per IRC:8 fixing in position including painting and printing, etc as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 1703 (II) Ordinary Kilometer Stone (Precast) 2292.00 Each 8.00 18336 4 9168 3 6876 6 13752 4 9168 25.00 57300

27 9.8 (iii) Kilometer Stone Reinforced cement concrete M15 grade kilometer stone/local stone of standard design as per IRC:8 fixing in position including painting and printing, etc as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 1703 (III) 200 m stone (precast) 660.00 Each 28.00 18480 12 7920 6 3960 19 12540 10 6600 75.00 49500

28 9.17 Guard Stone Reinforced cement concrete M15 grade Guard Stone of size 200 mm x 200mm x 800 mm fixing in position including painting and printing etc. as per drawing, Technical Specification and as per direction of Engineer in Charge. 525.00 Each 626.00 328650 214 112350 56 29400 404 212100 104 54600 1404.00 737100

29 9.18 Road marking with Hot Applied Thermoplastic Compound with Reflectorizing Glass Beads on Bituminous Surface (Providing and laying of hot applied thermoplastic compound 2.5 mm thick including reflectorizing glass beads @ 250 gms per sqm area, thickness of 2.5 mm is exclusive of surface applied glass beads as per IRC: 35. The finished surface to be level, uniform and free from streaks and holes.) 627.00 Sqm 1345.00 843315 600 376200 312 195624 1104 692208 612 383724 3973.00 2491071

30 9.19 (A) Speed Braker Providing and laying rounded hump type of Speed Breaker confirming to IRC – 99 and as per guidelines and drawings of NRRDA circular no. DO No. P-17019/6/2006/PII Dated 16 Sept 2009, including providing, laying and compaction of GSB, G II, G III, OGPC, Seal Coat Type B, as per specifications and appended drawing on both the sides of carriage way up to formation width maintaining rounded hump type shape with bituminous mix material i/c providing and painting of black and white strips, providing and fixing of two no. 600mm equilateral semi reflecting sign boards, i/c cost of all materials, labour T & P & Machinery etc complete and as directed by engineer in charge as per relevant clauses of MORD specifications. For 7.50 M Formation Width 22547.00 Each 4 90188 2 45094 2 45094 2 45094 2 45094 12.00 270564

31 7.6 (A) Providing and laying reinforced cement concrete pipe NP3 for Culverts/ Burried conduits on first class bedding of granular material including fixing collar with cement mortar 1:2 but excluding excavation, protection works, backfilling, concrete and masonry works in head walls and parapets as per Clause 1106. (A) 600 mm dia 2928.00 RM 100.00 292800 62.5 183000 37.5 109800 75 219600 62.5 183000 337.50 988200

32 7.1 (i) Excavation for Structure as per drawing and technical specifications Clause 305.1 including setting out, construction of shoring and bracing, removal of stumps and other deleterious material and disposal upto a lead of 50 m, dressing of sides and bottom and backfilling in trenches with excavated suitable material. i. Ordinary soil i. Upto 3 m depth 394.00 Cum 1328.01 523237 792.7668 312350 435.3769313 171539 1044.60824 411576 282.939 111478 3883.70 1530179

33 3.5 (i) (i) Excavation in Cutting in Soil by manual means Excavation for roadway in soil for carrying of cut earth to embankment site with a lift upto 1.5 m and lead upto 50 m as per Technical Specification Clause 302.3 65.00 Cum 405.00 26325 357.75 23254 202.5 13163 259.875 16892 337.5 21938 1562.63 101571

34 6.5 Construction of Plain Cement Concrete Drain with P.C.C. grade M-15 including all shuttering/form work etc. complete as per 4970.00 Cum 189.00 939330 166.95 829742 94.5 469665 121.275 602737 157.5 782775 729.23 3624248

35 7.27 Providing and laying reinforced cement concrete in superstructure as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 800, 1205.4 and 1205.5 II.R.C.C M 25 (Design mix) 6157.00 Cum 6.30 38789 5.565 34264 3.15 19395 4.0425 24890 5.25 32324 24.31 149661

36 7.28 Supplying, fitting, and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in superstructure complete as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 1002, 1010 and 1202 73726.00 MT 0.504 37158 0.4452 32823 0.252 18579 0.3234 23843 0.42 30965 1.94 143368

37 2.6 (A) Dismantling of Structures Dismantling of existing structures like culverts, bridges, retaining walls and other structure comprising of masonry, cement concrete, wood work, steel work, including T&P and scaffolding wherever necessary, sorting the dismantled material, disposal of unserviceable material and stacking the serviceable material with all lifts and lead of 1000 m as per Technical Specification Clause 202. (A)Lime Concrete 511.00 Cum 9.00 4599 9 4599 9 4599 9 4599 18 9198 54.00 27594

38 2.6 (C) Dismantling of Structures Dismantling of existing structures like culverts, bridges, retaining walls and other structure comprising of masonry, cement concrete, wood work, steel work, including T&P and scaffolding wherever necessary, sorting the dismantled material, disposal of unserviceable material and stacking the serviceable material with all lifts and lead of 1000 m as per Technical Specification Clause 202. (C)Reinforced Cement Concrete 1263.00 Cum 1.90 2395 1.896 2395 1.896 2395 1.896 2395 3.792 4789 11.38 14368

39 2.8 Dismantling Stone Masonry Dismantling of existing structures like culverts, bridges, retaining walls and other structure comprising of stone masonry, including disposal of unserviceable material and stacking the serviceable material with all lift and lead of 1000 m as per Technical Specification Clause 202. (A) Rubble Stone Masonry in Lime/Cement/mud mortar 412.00 Cum 37.84 15590 37.84 15590 37.84 15590 37.84 15590 75.68 31180 227.04 93540

40 2.10 (A) Removing all types of Hume pipes and stacking within a lead of 1000 m including Earthwork and Dismantling of Masonry Works as per Technical Specification Clause 202. (A) Upto 600 mm dia 256.00 M 7.50 1920 7.5 1920 7.5 1920 7.5 1920 15 3840 45.00 11520

41 7.1 (i) Excavation for Structure as per drawing and technical specifications Clause 305.1 including setting out, construction of shoring and bracing, removal of stumps and other deleterious material and disposal upto a lead of 50 m, dressing of sides and bottom and backfilling in trenches with excavated suitable material. i. Ordinary soil i. Upto 3 m depth 394 Cum 583.739 229993 107.73 42446 568.24 223887 328.794 129545 765.359691 301552 2353.86 927422

42 7.7 Plain Cement Concrete M10 (1:3:6 nominal mix) in levelling course below open foundation of Head walls as per drawings & Technical Specification Clause 1109 Nominal Mix 1:3:6(with 40mm Graded metal 4614 Cum 9.00 41526 5.625 25954 48.375 223202 16.875 77861 5.625 25954 85.50 394497

43 7.10 (i) Providing concrete for plain/reinforced concrete in open foundation complete as per drawings and technical specifications Clause 802, 803, 1202 & 1203 I P.C.C grade M 10(Nominal mix (1:3:6) 4614 Cum 73.349 338432 20.34 93849 520.3 2400664 47.148 217541 26.808 123692 687.95 3174178

44 7.10 (ii) Providing concrete for plain/reinforced concrete in open foundation complete as per drawings and technical specifications Clause 802, 803, 1202 & 1203 II P.C.C grade M 15(Nominal mix (1:2.5:5) 4576 Cum 253.052 1157966 511.8264 2342118 127.158 581875 651.9244979 2983207 307.1280944 1405418 1851.09 8470583

45 7.18 (i) Plain/reinforced cement concrete in substructure complete as per drawings and technical specification Clauses 802, 804, 805, 806, 807, 1202 ans 1204 For height upto 5 m I P.C.C grade M 15 (Nominal mix (1:2.5:5) 4839 Cum 412.7525 1997309 49.32 238659 81.708 395385 237.527 1149393 188.207 910734 969.51 4691481

46 7.18 (ii) Plain/reinforced cement concrete in substructure complete as per drawings and technical specification Clauses 802, 804, 805, 806, 807, 1202 ans 1204 For height upto 5 m II P.C.C grade M 20 (Nominal mix (1:2:4) 5384 Cum 405.00 2180520 405 2180520 135 726840 534.6 2878286 395.415 2128914 1875.02 10095081

47 7.27 (ii) Providing and laying reinforced cement concrete in superstructure as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 800, 1205.4 and 1205.5 II.R.C.C M 25 (Design mix) 6498 Cum 64.626 419940 0 0 16.279 105781 22.5715 146670 22.5715 146670 126.05 819060

48 7.28 Supplying, fitting, and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in superstructure complete as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 1002, 1010 and 1202 73726 MT 3.810433 280928 0 0 0.951602 70158 1.289631 95079 1.289631 95079 7.34 541244

49 7.22 Providing weepholes in brick masonry/stone masonry, plain/ reinforced concrete abutment, wing wall, return wall with 100 mm dia AC pipe extending through the full width of the structures with slope of 1(V):20(H) towards drawing face complete as per drawing and technical specification Clauses 614, 709, 1204.3.7 317 Nos. 969.00 307173 324 102708 235 74495 680 215560 315 99855 2523.00 799791

50 7.4 (b) Providing and Laying Reinforced Cement Concrete Pipe NP3 as per design Providing and laying reinforced cement concrete pipe NP3 for culverts on first class bedding of granular material in single row including fixing collar with cement mortar 1:2 but excluding excavation, protection works, backfilling, concrete and masonry works in head walls and parapets Clause 1106. 5468 M 20 109360 30 164040 20 109360 30 164040 0 0 100.00 546800

51 7.23 (i) Backfilling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall complete as per drawings & technical specification Clause 1204.3.8 I) Granular material 1032 Cum 640.26 660748 209.7 216410 189.13 195182 403.932 416858 187.032 193017 1630.05 1682215

52 7.23 (ii) Backfilling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall complete as per drawings & technical specification Clause 1204.3.8 II) Sandy material 1564 Cum 0 0 0 32 50048 0 0 87.87 137429 119.87 187477

53 7.31 Providing and laying cement concrete wearing course M 30 grade including reinforcement complete as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 800 and 1206.3 11782 Cum 3.83 45066 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.83 45066

Grand Total Construction A + Maintenance B Including GST 655.05 287.64 199.32 426.90 256.32 1825.23

G. TOTAL #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Sub Engineer (CGRRDA PIU 01 Jashpur) Assistant Engineer (CGRRDA 01 Jashpur) EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (CGRRDA 01 Jashpur)

Rate Quantity 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Rate Qty. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Rate Qty. 2 3 4 5 Total Rate Qty. 2 3 Total Rate Qty. 2 3 Total

Total Wt.(MT) 0.048254 -2.7

Say (Rs in Lacs ) : Total

Say (Rs in Lacs ) : Total Wt.(MT)

Say (Rs in Lacs ) :